chr16-84700106-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_005153.3(USP10):c.16C>T(p.Pro6Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000443 in 1,352,898 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005153.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USP10 | NM_005153.3 | c.16C>T | p.Pro6Ser | missense_variant | 1/14 | ENST00000219473.12 | NP_005144.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USP10 | ENST00000219473.12 | c.16C>T | p.Pro6Ser | missense_variant | 1/14 | 1 | NM_005153.3 | ENSP00000219473 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000133 AC: 2AN: 149878Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000332 AC: 4AN: 1203020Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000506 AC XY: 3AN XY: 593058
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000133 AC: 2AN: 149878Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000137 AC XY: 1AN XY: 73088
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 22, 2023 | The c.16C>T (p.P6S) alteration is located in exon 1 (coding exon 1) of the USP10 gene. This alteration results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 16, causing the proline (P) at amino acid position 6 to be replaced by a serine (S). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at