chr17-32266281-T-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6_Moderate
The NM_138328.3(RHBDL3):āc.92T>Cā(p.Leu31Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.0 ( 0 hom. )
Failed GnomAD Quality Control
Consequence
RHBDL3
NM_138328.3 missense
NM_138328.3 missense
Scores
2
2
15
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.672
Genes affected
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.1359157).
BP6
Variant 17-32266281-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-32266281-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 2569506.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RHBDL3 | NM_138328.3 | c.92T>C | p.Leu31Pro | missense_variant | 1/9 | ENST00000269051.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RHBDL3 | ENST00000269051.9 | c.92T>C | p.Leu31Pro | missense_variant | 1/9 | 1 | NM_138328.3 | P1 | |
RHBDL3 | ENST00000431505.6 | c.92T>C | p.Leu31Pro | missense_variant | 1/8 | 1 | |||
RHBDL3 | ENST00000538145.5 | c.92T>C | p.Leu31Pro | missense_variant | 1/8 | 1 | |||
RHBDL3 | ENST00000578006.5 | c.92T>C | p.Leu31Pro | missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 1/9 | 1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 1315474Hom.: 0 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 648556
GnomAD4 exome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
1315474
Hom.:
Cov.:
28
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
648556
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Apr 07, 2023 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;T;.
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
N
LIST_S2
Benign
T;T;T
M_CAP
Pathogenic
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
.;L;L
MutationTaster
Benign
N;N
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Uncertain
D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;T;D
Polyphen
0.0
.;B;.
Vest4
0.11, 0.13
MutPred
Gain of glycosylation at L31 (P = 0.0076);Gain of glycosylation at L31 (P = 0.0076);Gain of glycosylation at L31 (P = 0.0076);
MVP
MPC
1.1
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
No publications associated with this variant yet.