chr18-12325381-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 1P and 4B. PP3BS2
The NM_032525.3(TUBB6):c.592G>A(p.Glu198Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000479 in 1,461,884 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E198V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_032525.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TUBB6 | NM_032525.3 | c.592G>A | p.Glu198Lys | missense_variant | 4/4 | ENST00000317702.10 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TUBB6 | ENST00000317702.10 | c.592G>A | p.Glu198Lys | missense_variant | 4/4 | 1 | NM_032525.3 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000479 AC: 7AN: 1461884Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000688 AC XY: 5AN XY: 727244
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 29, 2023 | The c.592G>A (p.E198K) alteration is located in exon 4 (coding exon 4) of the TUBB6 gene. This alteration results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 592, causing the glutamic acid (E) at amino acid position 198 to be replaced by a lysine (K). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at