chr19-12464447-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Moderate
The NM_152601.4(ZNF709):c.1475G>A(p.Arg492Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000041 ( 0 hom. )
Failed GnomAD Quality Control
Consequence
ZNF709
NM_152601.4 missense
NM_152601.4 missense
Scores
19
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.0810
Genes affected
ZNF709 (HGNC:20629): (zinc finger protein 709) Predicted to enable DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specific and RNA polymerase II transcription regulatory region sequence-specific DNA binding activity. Predicted to be involved in regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II. Predicted to be active in nucleus. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.04192701).
BP6
Variant 19-12464447-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-12464447-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 2329371.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZNF709 | NM_152601.4 | c.1475G>A | p.Arg492Gln | missense_variant | 4/4 | ENST00000397732.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZNF709 | ENST00000397732.8 | c.1475G>A | p.Arg492Gln | missense_variant | 4/4 | 1 | NM_152601.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
33
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR AF: 0.00000411 AC: 6AN: 1459792Hom.: 0 Cov.: 39 AF XY: 0.00000413 AC XY: 3AN XY: 726266
GnomAD4 exome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR
AF:
AC:
6
AN:
1459792
Hom.:
Cov.:
39
AF XY:
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
726266
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
33
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
2
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
AC:
3
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 22, 2022 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;.
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
N
LIST_S2
Benign
T;.
M_CAP
Benign
T
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
L;.
MutationTaster
Benign
N
PrimateAI
Benign
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
T;T
Polyphen
P;.
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at