chr19-45409085-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBA1
The NM_012099.3(POLR1G):c.1117A>G(p.Lys373Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.168 in 1,613,908 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 26,751 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_012099.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLR1G | NM_012099.3 | c.1117A>G | p.Lys373Glu | missense_variant | 3/3 | ENST00000309424.8 | |
ERCC1 | NM_001983.4 | c.*590T>C | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 10/10 | ENST00000300853.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLR1G | ENST00000309424.8 | c.1117A>G | p.Lys373Glu | missense_variant | 3/3 | 1 | NM_012099.3 | P4 | |
ERCC1 | ENST00000300853.8 | c.*590T>C | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 10/10 | 1 | NM_001983.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.201 AC: 30596AN: 152042Hom.: 3570 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.208 AC: 51607AN: 247896Hom.: 6445 AF XY: 0.204 AC XY: 27401AN XY: 134560
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.164 AC: 240211AN: 1461748Hom.: 23177 Cov.: 43 AF XY: 0.167 AC XY: 121275AN XY: 727178
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.201 AC: 30627AN: 152160Hom.: 3574 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.205 AC XY: 15238AN XY: 74384
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 14, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at