chr2-110123541-G-A

Position:

• chr2-110123541-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_Strong BS1_Supporting

The NM_001128178.3(NPHP1):​c.*250C>T variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0011 in 387,402 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0014 (1 hom., cov: 33)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00090 (1 hom.)
• Consequence: NPHP1 NM_001128178.3 3_prime_UTR
• Clinical Significance: Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:3
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.0770

Genes affected

NPHP1 (HGNC:7905): (nephrocystin 1) This gene encodes a protein with src homology domain 3 (SH3) patterns. This protein interacts with Crk-associated substrate, and it appears to function in the control of cell division, as well as in cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesion signaling, likely as part of a multifunctional complex localized in actin- and microtubule-based structures. Mutations in this gene cause familial juvenile nephronophthisis type 1, a kidney disorder involving both tubules and glomeruli. Defects in this gene are also associated with Senior-Loken syndrome type 1, also referred to as juvenile nephronophthisis with Leber amaurosis, which is characterized by kidney and eye disease, and with Joubert syndrome type 4, which is characterized by cerebellar ataxia, oculomotor apraxia, psychomotor delay and neonatal breathing abnormalities, sometimes including retinal dystrophy and renal disease. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0014 (212/151874) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0029 (120/41424). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00248. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 109 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
NPHP1	NM_001128178.3	c.*250C>T		3_prime_UTR_variant	20/20	ENST00000445609.7

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
NPHP1	ENST00000445609.7	c.*250C>T		3_prime_UTR_variant	20/20	1	NM_001128178.3	P2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00138 AC: 209 AN: 151756 Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.00283

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.000918

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00779

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.000575

Gnomad MID AF: 0.0127

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.000456

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00480

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000904 AC: 213 AN: 235528 Hom.: 1 Cov.: 3 AF XY: 0.000774 AC XY: 96 AN XY: 124092

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.00318

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00103

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00715

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.000496

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.000593

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00162

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00140 AC: 212 AN: 151874 Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00147 AC XY: 109 AN XY: 74208

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.00290

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.000917

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00779

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.000575

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.000456

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00475

Alfa AF: 0.000832 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.00131

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

Submissions by phenotype

Senior-Loken syndrome 1 Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Nephronophthisis 1 Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Joubert syndrome with renal defect Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.84
CADD	Benign	1.1
DANN	Benign	0.51

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs150558683; hg19: chr2-110881118;