chr2-200571375-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_152524.6(SGO2):c.1029G>T(p.Glu343Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000526 in 1,611,544 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E343A) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_152524.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGO2 | NM_152524.6 | c.1029G>T | p.Glu343Asp | missense_variant | 7/9 | ENST00000357799.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGO2 | ENST00000357799.9 | c.1029G>T | p.Glu343Asp | missense_variant | 7/9 | 1 | NM_152524.6 | P3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00295 AC: 448AN: 152110Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000714 AC: 177AN: 247874Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000483 AC XY: 65AN XY: 134502
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000275 AC: 401AN: 1459316Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000222 AC XY: 161AN XY: 725478
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00294 AC: 447AN: 152228Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00271 AC XY: 202AN XY: 74442
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Mar 29, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at