chr2-53801819-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS2
The NM_015701.5(ERLEC1):c.856G>A(p.Val286Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000514 in 1,613,730 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_015701.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERLEC1 | NM_015701.5 | c.856G>A | p.Val286Met | missense_variant | 8/14 | ENST00000185150.9 | |
GPR75-ASB3 | NM_001164165.2 | c.102-36234C>T | intron_variant | ||||
ERLEC1 | NM_001127397.3 | c.856G>A | p.Val286Met | missense_variant | 8/13 | ||
ERLEC1 | NM_001127398.3 | c.856G>A | p.Val286Met | missense_variant | 8/13 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERLEC1 | ENST00000185150.9 | c.856G>A | p.Val286Met | missense_variant | 8/14 | 1 | NM_015701.5 | P3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000270 AC: 41AN: 152068Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00105 AC: 264AN: 251102Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.00141 AC XY: 192AN XY: 135720
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000540 AC: 789AN: 1461544Hom.: 6 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000745 AC XY: 542AN XY: 727094
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000269 AC: 41AN: 152186Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000336 AC XY: 25AN XY: 74396
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jun 01, 2023 | ERLEC1: BP4, BS2 - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at