Menu
GeneBe

chr20-3227678-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_001174089.2(SLC4A11):​c.*109C>T variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000515 in 1,186,696 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0022 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00027 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

SLC4A11
NM_001174089.2 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.537
Variant links:
Genes affected
SLC4A11 (HGNC:16438): (solute carrier family 4 member 11) This gene encodes a voltage-regulated, electrogenic sodium-coupled borate cotransporter that is essential for borate homeostasis, cell growth and cell proliferation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with a number of endothelial corneal dystrophies including recessive corneal endothelial dystrophy 2, corneal dystrophy and perceptive deafness, and Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00219 (334/152278) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00715 (297/41558). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00648. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 160 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 334 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
SLC4A11NM_001174089.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.*109C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant 20/20 ENST00000642402.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
SLC4A11ENST00000642402.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.*109C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant 20/20 NM_001174089.2 P2Q8NBS3-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00220
AC:
334
AN:
152160
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00717
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00177
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00287
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000268
AC:
277
AN:
1034418
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
13
AF XY:
0.000226
AC XY:
119
AN XY:
527160
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00806
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000702
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000137
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000212
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000669
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00219
AC:
334
AN:
152278
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00215
AC XY:
160
AN XY:
74444
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00715
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00176
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00284
Alfa
AF:
0.00109
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00258
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Corneal dystrophy Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.86
CADD
Benign
0.76
DANN
Benign
0.37
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.0

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs143751993; hg19: chr20-3208324; API