chr3-146070130-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_182943.3(PLOD2):c.*587G>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000725 in 151,764 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000072 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0 ( 0 hom. )
Failed GnomAD Quality Control
Consequence
PLOD2
NM_182943.3 3_prime_UTR
NM_182943.3 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -2.74
Genes affected
PLOD2 (HGNC:9082): (procollagen-lysine,2-oxoglutarate 5-dioxygenase 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a membrane-bound homodimeric enzyme that is localized to the cisternae of the rough endoplasmic reticulum. The enzyme (cofactors iron and ascorbate) catalyzes the hydroxylation of lysyl residues in collagen-like peptides. The resultant hydroxylysyl groups are attachment sites for carbohydrates in collagen and thus are critical for the stability of intermolecular crosslinks. Some patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VIB have deficiencies in lysyl hydroxylase activity. Mutations in the coding region of this gene are associated with Bruck syndrome. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.91).
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLOD2 | NM_182943.3 | c.*587G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 20/20 | ENST00000282903.10 | ||
PLOD2 | NM_000935.3 | c.*587G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 19/19 | |||
PLOD2 | XM_017006625.3 | c.*587G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 21/21 | |||
PLOD2 | XM_047448319.1 | c.*587G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 20/20 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLOD2 | ENST00000282903.10 | c.*587G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 20/20 | 1 | NM_182943.3 | P3 | ||
ENST00000480247.1 | n.337+1952C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000725 AC: 11AN: 151764Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
11
AN:
151764
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 32Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 24
GnomAD4 exome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
32
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
24
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000725 AC: 11AN: 151764Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000540 AC XY: 4AN XY: 74078
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
11
AN:
151764
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
74078
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Bruck syndrome 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at