chr3-187236187-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_139125.4(MASP1):c.1684C>T(p.Pro562Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,782 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P562A) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_139125.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- 3MC syndrome 1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- 3MC syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MASP1 | NM_139125.4 | c.1684C>T | p.Pro562Ser | missense_variant | Exon 11 of 11 | ENST00000296280.11 | NP_624302.1 | |
| MASP1 | NM_001879.6 | c.1303+5294C>T | intron_variant | Intron 10 of 15 | ENST00000337774.10 | NP_001870.3 | ||
| MASP1 | NR_033519.2 | n.1557C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 10 of 10 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461782Hom.: 0 Cov.: 81 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727196 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at