chr5-79647825-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_001114394.3(TENT2):c.822-792G>C variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.207 in 151,800 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4,685 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001114394.3 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001114394.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TENT2 | NM_001114394.3 | MANE Select | c.822-792G>C | intron | N/A | NP_001107866.1 | |||
| TENT2 | NM_001349549.2 | c.897-792G>C | intron | N/A | NP_001336478.1 | ||||
| TENT2 | NM_001349550.2 | c.897-792G>C | intron | N/A | NP_001336479.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TENT2 | ENST00000453514.6 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.822-792G>C | intron | N/A | ENSP00000397563.1 | |||
| TENT2 | ENST00000423041.6 | TSL:1 | c.810-792G>C | intron | N/A | ENSP00000393412.2 | |||
| TENT2 | ENST00000504233.5 | TSL:1 | c.822-792G>C | intron | N/A | ENSP00000421966.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.207 AC: 31402AN: 151688Hom.: 4671 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.207 AC: 31457AN: 151800Hom.: 4685 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.205 AC XY: 15221AN XY: 74168 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at