chr5-90629476-C-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2
The NM_032119.4(ADGRV1):c.1776C>A(p.Val592=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00132 in 1,613,400 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0013 ( 2 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0013 ( 8 hom. )
Consequence
ADGRV1
NM_032119.4 synonymous
NM_032119.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.182
Genes affected
ADGRV1 (HGNC:17416): (adhesion G protein-coupled receptor V1) This gene encodes a member of the G-protein coupled receptor superfamily. The encoded protein contains a 7-transmembrane receptor domain, binds calcium and is expressed in the central nervous system. Mutations in this gene are associated with Usher syndrome 2 and familial febrile seizures. Several alternatively spliced transcripts have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.67).
BP6
Variant 5-90629476-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-90629476-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 46293.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr5-90629476-C-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr5-90629476-C-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.182 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR,Digenic gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADGRV1 | NM_032119.4 | c.1776C>A | p.Val592= | synonymous_variant | 9/90 | ENST00000405460.9 | NP_115495.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADGRV1 | ENST00000405460.9 | c.1776C>A | p.Val592= | synonymous_variant | 9/90 | 1 | NM_032119.4 | ENSP00000384582 | P1 | |
ADGRV1 | ENST00000504142.2 | n.542C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 3/14 | 5 | |||||
ADGRV1 | ENST00000640109.1 | n.1872C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 9/9 | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00128 AC: 194AN: 151980Hom.: 2 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
194
AN:
151980
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00151 AC: 376AN: 248788Hom.: 4 AF XY: 0.00149 AC XY: 201AN XY: 134992
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
376
AN:
248788
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
201
AN XY:
134992
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00132 AC: 1935AN: 1461302Hom.: 8 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00132 AC XY: 956AN XY: 726942
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1935
AN:
1461302
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
956
AN XY:
726942
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00128 AC: 194AN: 152098Hom.: 2 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00121 AC XY: 90AN XY: 74338
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
194
AN:
152098
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
90
AN XY:
74338
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 24, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Apr 08, 2016 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Jul 25, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Aug 06, 2015 | p.Val592Val in exon 9 of GPR98: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence and has been identified in 0.2% (142/66510) of E uropean chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broad institute.org; dbSNP rs184127858). - |
Usher syndrome type 2C Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at