chr6-64591894-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001142800.2(EYS):ā€‹c.3973C>Gā€‹(p.Gln1325Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.129 in 1,547,756 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 13,776 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.10 ( 924 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.13 ( 12852 hom. )

Consequence

EYS
NM_001142800.2 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.11
Variant links:
Genes affected
EYS (HGNC:21555): (eyes shut homolog) The product of this gene contains multiple epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like and LamG domains. The protein is expressed in the photoreceptor layer of the retina, and the gene is mutated in autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0019658804).
BP6
Variant 6-64591894-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-64591894-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 93608.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr6-64591894-G-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.156 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
EYSNM_001142800.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.3973C>G p.Gln1325Glu missense_variant 26/43 ENST00000503581.6 NP_001136272.1
EYSNM_001292009.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.3973C>G p.Gln1325Glu missense_variant 26/44 NP_001278938.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
EYSENST00000503581.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.3973C>G p.Gln1325Glu missense_variant 26/435 NM_001142800.2 ENSP00000424243 A2Q5T1H1-1
EYSENST00000370621.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.3973C>G p.Gln1325Glu missense_variant 26/441 ENSP00000359655 P2Q5T1H1-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.101
AC:
15349
AN:
152054
Hom.:
926
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0364
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.105
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.125
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0723
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.166
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.112
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0740
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0696
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.135
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0989
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.117
AC:
17920
AN:
152598
Hom.:
1213
AF XY:
0.118
AC XY:
9551
AN XY:
80912
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0301
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.134
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0803
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.174
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.103
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0815
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.132
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.118
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.132
AC:
183552
AN:
1395584
Hom.:
12852
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.131
AC XY:
90292
AN XY:
688332
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.134
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0789
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.144
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.104
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0806
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.140
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.124
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.101
AC:
15345
AN:
152172
Hom.:
924
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0992
AC XY:
7380
AN XY:
74404
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0363
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.124
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0723
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.165
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.112
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0740
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.135
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0979
Alfa
AF:
0.126
Hom.:
1005
Bravo
AF:
0.105
TwinsUK
AF:
0.135
AC:
500
ALSPAC
AF:
0.128
AC:
494
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0354
AC:
49
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.140
AC:
446
ExAC
AF:
0.0969
AC:
2120
Asia WGS
AF:
0.122
AC:
423
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Sep 19, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxAug 11, 2011This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Retinitis pigmentosa Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Retinitis pigmentosa 25 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 01, 2021- -
Retinal dystrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchDept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya UniversityOct 01, 2023- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.050
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.66
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.58
CADD
Benign
0.0010
DANN
Benign
0.11
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.041
.;T
Eigen
Benign
-1.8
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.8
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.00052
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.22
T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0020
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.34
N;N
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
P;P;P
PrimateAI
Benign
0.22
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.38
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.17
Sift
Benign
1.0
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.089
T;T
Polyphen
0.0
B;B
Vest4
0.034
MPC
0.0096
ClinPred
0.00044
T
GERP RS
-2.6
Varity_R
0.034
gMVP
0.057

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs12663622; hg19: chr6-65301787; COSMIC: COSV58196646; COSMIC: COSV58196646; API