chr8-18067230-A-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The ENST00000637790.2(ASAH1):​c.372T>A​(p.Asp124Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0407 in 1,605,582 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,602 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D124A) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.034 ( 118 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.041 ( 1484 hom. )

Consequence

ASAH1
ENST00000637790.2 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.24
Variant links:
Genes affected
ASAH1 (HGNC:735): (N-acylsphingosine amidohydrolase 1) This gene encodes a member of the acid ceramidase family of proteins. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed. Processing of this preproprotein generates alpha and beta subunits that heterodimerize to form the mature lysosomal enzyme, which catalyzes the degradation of ceramide into sphingosine and free fatty acid. This enzyme is overexpressed in multiple human cancers and may play a role in cancer progression. Mutations in this gene are associated with the lysosomal storage disorder, Farber lipogranulomatosis, and a neuromuscular disorder, spinal muscular atrophy with progressive myoclonic epilepsy. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0013536811).
BP6
Variant 8-18067230-A-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-18067230-A-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 362381.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr8-18067230-A-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0513 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
ASAH1NM_177924.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.372T>A p.Asp124Glu missense_variant 5/14 ENST00000637790.2 NP_808592.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ASAH1ENST00000637790.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.372T>A p.Asp124Glu missense_variant 5/141 NM_177924.5 ENSP00000490272 P2Q13510-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0337
AC:
5016
AN:
148786
Hom.:
118
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0109
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.117
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0250
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0705
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000777
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0572
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0500
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0190
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0452
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0320
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0388
AC:
9709
AN:
249922
Hom.:
260
AF XY:
0.0421
AC XY:
5693
AN XY:
135202
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0108
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0162
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0683
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000708
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0656
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0472
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0442
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0448
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0414
AC:
60273
AN:
1456692
Hom.:
1484
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0424
AC XY:
30728
AN XY:
724554
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0106
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0185
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0671
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000303
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0646
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0468
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0421
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0406
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0337
AC:
5015
AN:
148890
Hom.:
118
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0343
AC XY:
2489
AN XY:
72652
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0109
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0249
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0705
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000779
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0569
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0500
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0452
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0322
Alfa
AF:
0.0410
Hom.:
93
Bravo
AF:
0.0297
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0410
AC:
152
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0413
AC:
159
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0136
AC:
60
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0450
AC:
387
ExAC
AF:
0.0414
AC:
5022
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0250
AC:
90
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 28, 2018- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicMar 16, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsJul 17, 2017- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Farber lipogranulomatosis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.10
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.67
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.68
CADD
Benign
9.7
DANN
Benign
0.97
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.31
T;T;T;.;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;.;.;.;.;T;T;T;T;T;T;.;.;.;T
Eigen
Benign
-1.0
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.0
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.039
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.77
.;T;T;T;T;.;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;.;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0014
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.29
N;N;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.23
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.1
.;N;N;N;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;N;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
REVEL
Benign
0.064
Sift
Benign
0.12
.;T;T;T;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;T;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.095
.;T;T;T;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;T;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
Polyphen
0.0
B;B;B;B;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.069, 0.017, 0.068
MutPred
0.15
Gain of solvent accessibility (P = 0.2601);Gain of solvent accessibility (P = 0.2601);Gain of solvent accessibility (P = 0.2601);.;.;.;Gain of solvent accessibility (P = 0.2601);.;Gain of solvent accessibility (P = 0.2601);Gain of solvent accessibility (P = 0.2601);.;Gain of solvent accessibility (P = 0.2601);.;.;.;Gain of solvent accessibility (P = 0.2601);.;.;.;Gain of solvent accessibility (P = 0.2601);Gain of solvent accessibility (P = 0.2601);.;.;.;.;
MPC
0.0033
ClinPred
0.0035
T
GERP RS
-2.9
Varity_R
0.12
gMVP
0.77

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2472205; hg19: chr8-17924739; API