rs104894619

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 3P and 8B. PM1PP3BP4_StrongBS2

The NM_000304.4(PMP22):​c.353C>T​(p.Thr118Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00509 in 1,614,092 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 31 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0036 ( 3 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0052 ( 28 hom. )

Consequence

PMP22
NM_000304.4 missense

Scores

15
2
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:3U:15B:4O:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 9.84
Variant links:
Genes affected
PMP22 (HGNC:9118): (peripheral myelin protein 22) This gene encodes an integral membrane protein that is a major component of myelin in the peripheral nervous system. Studies suggest two alternately used promoters drive tissue-specific expression. Various mutations of this gene are causes of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Type IA, Dejerine-Sottas syndrome, and hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

PM1
In a chain Peripheral myelin protein 22 (size 159) in uniprot entity PMP22_HUMAN there are 53 pathogenic changes around while only 3 benign (95%) in NM_000304.4
PP3
Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect 11: AlphaMissense, BayesDel_addAF, BayesDel_noAF, Cadd, Dann, Eigen, M_CAP, MutationAssessor, phyloP100way_vertebrate, PROVEAN, REVEL [when max_spliceai, FATHMM_MKL, MetaRNN, MutationTaster was below the threshold]
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.04382956).
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 3 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
PMP22NM_000304.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.353C>T p.Thr118Met missense_variant 5/5 ENST00000312280.9 NP_000295.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PMP22ENST00000312280.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.353C>T p.Thr118Met missense_variant 5/51 NM_000304.4 ENSP00000308937 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00364
AC:
554
AN:
152234
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000796
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000850
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00605
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00103
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00555
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00613
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00239
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00402
AC:
1009
AN:
250976
Hom.:
4
AF XY:
0.00404
AC XY:
549
AN XY:
135766
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000986
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000463
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00457
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000163
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00127
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00585
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00649
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00441
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00525
AC:
7669
AN:
1461740
Hom.:
28
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00505
AC XY:
3674
AN XY:
727184
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000508
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000626
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00490
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000756
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00139
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00683
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00604
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00472
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00364
AC:
554
AN:
152352
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00325
AC XY:
242
AN XY:
74506
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000794
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000849
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00605
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00103
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00555
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00613
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00237
Alfa
AF:
0.00503
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00284
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00458
AC:
17
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00467
AC:
18
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000681
AC:
3
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00535
AC:
46
ExAC
AF:
0.00465
AC:
565
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00491
EpiControl
AF:
0.00421

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:3Uncertain:15Benign:4Other:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:8Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and ClinicsJan 18, 2016- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsApr 11, 2023Available data are insufficient to determine the clinical significance of the variant at this time. The frequency of this variant in the general population is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants associated with autosomal dominant Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) (Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD), Cambridge, MA (URL: http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)). This variant does not segregate with disease in a manner consistent with dominant inheritance. Some literature suggests it may instead be a recessive and/or partial loss of function variant (PMID: 8252046, 16437560, 26012543, 30675404), thereby reducing severity of symptoms in patients with PMP22 duplications, while increasing severity in patients with PMP22 deletions. This variant has been reported to have a mild or lack of clinical effect in several heterozygous individuals (PMID: 8252046, 9452099, 10586280, 11081809), and also reported in one homozygous patient with a severe axonal neuropathy (PMID: 16437560). Assessment of experimental evidence suggests this variant results in abnormal protein function. Experiments indicated this variant results in a reduction of protein transportation to the plasma membrane, with the majority sequestered in the endoplasmic reticulum. However, the effect seen in this assay was less severe than for known pathogenic variants (PMID: 10078969, 15537650, 26102530). -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Aug 24, 2015- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 07, 2024Reported in an individual with CMT who had a pathogenic deletion of PMP22 on the opposite allele; the authors concluded p.(T118M) was likely an autosomal recessive allele because it was also identified in the individual's unaffected son (PMID: 8252046); It has been suggested that the p.(T118M) variant may modify disease severity in individuals with another PMP22 pathogenic variant (PMID: 26012543); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23891399, 11081809, 26392352, 31471994, 31127728, 31357912, 20301566, 19067730, 21228398, 10078969, 7649472, 14502374, 28374912, 30675404, 30685714, 29655802, 27609586, 26102530, 31664448, 32513719, 32376792, 34426522, 26012543, 36581210, 19691535, 16437560, 10586280, 21194947, 8252046, 37703609, 36539320, 32719652) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicFeb 28, 2022- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesOct 09, 2023The PMP22 c.353C>T; p.Thr118Met variant (rs104894619) is reported in the literature in multiple individuals affected with Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease and hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies (HNPP), although its clinical significance is controversial (Ho 2018, Keckarevic-Markovic 2009, Marques 2003, Nelis 1997, Roa 1993, Russo 2011, Seeman 1999, Shy 2006, Volodarsky 2021). Several reports of p.Thr118Met in affected families indicate possible recessive inheritance, as a more severe phenotype is observed in individuals carrying p.Thr118Met in trans to PMP22 deletions (Roa 1993), and at least one affected homozygote has been reported (Shy 2006). However, its inheritance pattern remains unclear, as both affected and unaffected heterozygous individuals have been also described (Ho 2018, Keckarevic-Markovic 2009, Nelis 1997, Roa 1993, Russo 2011). Further, in several families with both the p.Thr118Met variant and a pathogenic PMP22 duplication, the missense variant failed to segregate with disease (Marques 2003, Nelis 1997, Seeman 1999). The p.Thr118Met variant is found in the non-Finnish European population with an overall allele frequency of 0.66% (855/128884 alleles, including 3 homozygotes) in the Genome Aggregation Database (v2.1.1), which exceeds the estimated prevalence of CMT disease in the population (Theodom 2019). Computational analyses predict that this variant is deleterious (REVEL: 0.955). Consistent with predictions, functional studies indicate the variant protein fails to properly traffic to the plasma membrane (Schlebach 2015, Stefanski 2023). Due to conflicting information, and because a low penetrance effect cannot be ruled out, the clinical significance of the p.Thr118Met variant is uncertain at this time. References: Ho et al. T118M Variant of PMP22 Gene Presents with Painful Peripheral Neuropathy and Varying Charcot-Marie-Tooth Features: A Case Series and Review of the Literature. Case Rep Genet. 2018 Dec 25;2018:2618071. PMID: 30675404. Keckarevic-Markovic et al. Mutational analysis of GJB1, MPZ, PMP22, EGR2, and LITAF/SIMPLE in Serbian Charcot-Marie-Tooth patients. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2009; 14(2): 125-136. PMID: 19691535. Marques et al. Thr(118)Met amino acid substitution in the peripheral myelin protein 22 does not influence the clinical phenotype of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A due to the 17p11.2-p12 duplication. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2003; 36(10): 1403-1407. PMID: 14502374. Nelis et al. PMP22 Thr(118)Met: recessive CMT1 mutation or polymorphism? Nat Genet. 1997; 15(1): 13-14. PMID: 8988161. Roa et al. Evidence for a recessive PMP22 point mutation in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A. Nat Genet. 1993; 5(2): 189-194. PMID: 8252046. Russo et al. Variable phenotypes are associated with PMP22 missense mutations. Neuromuscul Disord. 2011; 21(2): 106-114. PMID: 21194947. Schlebach et al. Conformational Stability and Pathogenic Misfolding of the Integral Membrane Protein PMP22. J Am Chem Soc. 2015; 137(27): 8758-8768. PMID: 26102530. Seeman et al. Charcot-Marie-Tooth 1A: heterozygous T118M mutation over a CMT1A duplication has no influence on the phenotype. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999; 883: 485-489. PMID: 10586280. Shy et al. T118M PMP22 mutation causes partial loss of function and HNPP-like neuropathy. Ann Neurol. 2006; 59(2): 358-364. PMID: 16437560. Stefanski KM et al. How T118M peripheral myelin protein 22 predisposes humans to Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. J Biol Chem. 2023 Feb;299(2):102839. PMID: 36581210. Theadom et al. Prevalence of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease across the lifespan: a population-based epidemiological study. BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 14;9(6):e029240. PMID: 31203252. Volodarsky et al. Comprehensive genetic sequence and copy number analysis for Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease in a Canadian cohort of 2517 patients. J Med Genet. 2021 Apr;58(4):284-288. PMID: 32376792. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingRevvity Omics, RevvityApr 01, 2022- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenAug 01, 2024PMP22: BS2 -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Skane University Hospital LundMay 27, 2022- -
Hereditary liability to pressure palsies Pathogenic:1Uncertain:2Benign:2Other:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria providedliterature onlyOMIMMar 01, 2009- -
not provided, no classification providedliterature onlyGeneReviews-- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedliterature onlyInherited Neuropathy Consortium-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsAug 22, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingUndiagnosed Diseases Network, NIHJul 04, 2018This variant was also detected in the proband's father, who was found to have myopathic changes on EMG. This does not fully explain the proband's features but may be contributing to her phenotype. -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMolecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre-- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedprovider interpretationInherited Neuropathy Consortium-- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, type I Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 28, 2024This sequence change replaces threonine, which is neutral and polar, with methionine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 118 of the PMP22 protein (p.Thr118Met). This variant is present in population databases (rs104894619, gnomAD 0.7%), and has an allele count higher than expected for a pathogenic variant. This variant has been reported in individuals and families with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A (PMID: 16437560, 8988161, 8252046, 19691535, 21194947, 26392352). It has been reported as a dominantly inherited variant with reduced penetrance because both heterozygous affected (PMID: 21194947) and heterozygous unaffected individuals have been observed in several families (PMID: 8252046, 10586280). It has also been reported as a recessively inherited, partial loss of function allele based on observations of individuals with a more severe phenotype who presented as compound heterozygous for this allele along with a PMP22 deletion allele (PMID: 8252046, 26012543), and one individual with a more severe phenotype who was homozygous for this allele (PMID: 16437560). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 8431). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be disruptive. Functional studies show this variant is retained in the cytoplasm, albeit to a lesser extent compared to other PMP22 variants (PMID: 10078969). In addition, it leads to altered nuclei with an apoptotic-like phenotype when expressed in COS cells but not when co-expressed with wild type PMP22, which could be consistent with a recessive mode of inheritance in contrast to other PMP22 variants (PMID: 7649472). In summary, this variant has been reported to be dominantly inherited in individuals with CMT1A and it has also been reported to be recessively inherited in individuals with CMT1A who have presented with a more severe phenotype. This variant has also been shown to mildly disrupt protein function. However, the pathogenicity of this variant is much debated because it is present at a high frequency in the general population and it has been observed in unaffected and affected individuals within the same family. For these reasons, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, type IA Uncertain:1Other:1
not provided, no classification providedliterature onlyGeneReviews-- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical CenterOct 29, 2018- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, type 1a, autosomal recessive Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria providedliterature onlyOMIMMar 01, 2009- -
Tip-toe gait Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPractice for Gait Abnormalities, David Pomarino, Competency Network Toe Walking c/o Practice PomarinoMar 05, 2021The heterozygous variant c.353C> T p. (Thr118Met) was detected in the PMP22 gene [dbSNP rs104894619; frequency T = 0.468% (ExAC)]. In the literature [Shy (2006) Ann Neurol 59: 358; Keckarevic-Markovic (2009) J Peripher Nerv Syst 14: 125; Russo (2011) Neuromuscul Disord 21: 106 and Ho (2018) Case Rep Genet 2018: 2618071] this variant is associated with hereditary neuropathies. However, the authors refer to numerous older studies in which it is controversially discussed and in some cases it is assigned an unclear clinical effect up to and including classification as a non-pathological polymorphism. These very inconsistent and controversial classifications are reflected in the databases ClinVar [4x pathogenic, 13x VUS, 3x likely / benign] and LOVD [7x pathogenic, 5x VUS, 2x likely benign]. A "reduced penetrance" [Russo (2011) Neuromuscul Disord 21: 106] of the proven variant is being discussed, since it was also demonstrated in control groups of the studies. In addition, a partial loss of function was observed for the protein affected by the variant depending on the genotype [Shy (2006) Ann Neurol 59: 358]. Modulating effects due to variants in other genes cannot be ruled out either. Hereditary motor sensory neuropathy (HMSN), also known as Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease (CMT), is the most commonly inherited peripheral polyneuropathy. It constitutes a group of inherited, progressive, motor and sensory peripheral nerve disorders with properties of demyelination, axonal degeneration, or both. It is classified by clinical characteristics, modes of inheritance, electrophysiologic features, metabolic defects, and specific gene markers. Our patients all walk on tiptoe, so they show similar symptoms. When we genetically test them with our toe walking panel, we find that around 90 per cent of them have a genetic variant that explains their toe walking. These can be assigned, for example, to the area of myopathies (such as variants of the COL6A3 gene), the area of hereditary neuropathies (such as variants of the KMT2C gene) or the area of metabolic diseases (such as variants of the PYGM gene). In a smaller group of patients with almost identical symptoms, no abnormality is found in the genes of our panel, but spastic paraplegia can be detected. In another small group of our toe walkers, no abnormalities can be detected in the genes analysed in our toe walking panel, nor do they suffer from spastic paraplegia, as is also the case with healthy children. In contrast to these, however, they show a tiptoe gait. These patients suffer from infantile cerebral palsy, in which toe walking can also be observed. -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoJul 31, 2015- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.69
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
0.17
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.47
CADD
Pathogenic
28
DANN
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
0.97
D;D;D;.
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.95
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.89
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
1.0
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.94
D;.;.;D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.35
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.044
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Pathogenic
0.79
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
3.3
M;M;M;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
A;A;A;A
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.63
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-5.5
.;D;D;.
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.95
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
.;D;D;.
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0010
D;D;D;.
Polyphen
1.0
D;D;D;.
Vest4
0.85
MVP
0.95
MPC
1.3
ClinPred
0.045
T
GERP RS
5.2
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
2.7
Varity_R
0.79
gMVP
0.89

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs104894619; hg19: chr17-15134364; API