rs1058284

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001927.4(DES):​c.1104G>A​(p.Ala368=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.344 in 1,613,624 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 97,240 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.36 ( 10366 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.34 ( 86874 hom. )

Consequence

DES
NM_001927.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:17

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.32
Variant links:
Genes affected
DES (HGNC:2770): (desmin) This gene encodes a muscle-specific class III intermediate filament. Homopolymers of this protein form a stable intracytoplasmic filamentous network connecting myofibrils to each other and to the plasma membrane. Mutations in this gene are associated with desmin-related myopathy, a familial cardiac and skeletal myopathy (CSM), and with distal myopathies. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.98).
BP6
Variant 2-219421420-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-219421420-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 44245.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-219421420-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.32 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.429 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
DESNM_001927.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1104G>A p.Ala368= synonymous_variant 6/9 ENST00000373960.4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
DESENST00000373960.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1104G>A p.Ala368= synonymous_variant 6/91 NM_001927.4 P1
DESENST00000477226.6 linkuse as main transcriptn.578G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 5/84
DESENST00000492726.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.499G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 5/64
DESENST00000683013.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.492G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 4/7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.363
AC:
55087
AN:
151706
Hom.:
10347
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.435
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.436
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.365
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.412
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.185
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.296
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.265
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.418
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.348
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.382
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.332
AC:
83512
AN:
251348
Hom.:
14337
AF XY:
0.333
AC XY:
45208
AN XY:
135870
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.440
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.310
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.421
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.190
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.298
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.280
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.357
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.359
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.342
AC:
499613
AN:
1461800
Hom.:
86874
Cov.:
47
AF XY:
0.341
AC XY:
247839
AN XY:
727212
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.440
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.316
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.415
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.183
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.296
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.276
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.350
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.352
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.363
AC:
55140
AN:
151824
Hom.:
10366
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.359
AC XY:
26667
AN XY:
74194
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.434
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.365
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.412
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.185
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.295
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.265
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.348
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.389
Alfa
AF:
0.363
Hom.:
16682
Bravo
AF:
0.374
Asia WGS
AF:
0.286
AC:
993
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.366
EpiControl
AF:
0.361

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:17
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:9
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineFeb 15, 2008- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoAug 15, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Feb 17, 2016- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Desmin-related myofibrillar myopathy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsJul 12, 2017- -
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1I Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Myofibrillar Myopathy, Dominant Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Neurogenic scapuloperoneal syndrome, Kaeser type Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 27, 2015This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.98
CADD
Benign
0.20
DANN
Benign
0.90

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1058284; hg19: chr2-220286142; COSMIC: COSV64660434; COSMIC: COSV64660434; API