rs1060819
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_025092.5(PGGHG):c.*778T>C variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.718 in 152,244 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 39,488 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_025092.5 3_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_025092.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGGHG | NM_025092.5 | MANE Select | c.*778T>C | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 14 of 14 | NP_079368.3 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGGHG | ENST00000409548.7 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.*778T>C | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 14 of 14 | ENSP00000387185.2 | |||
| PGGHG | ENST00000409655.5 | TSL:1 | c.*778T>C | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 13 of 13 | ENSP00000386297.1 | |||
| PGGHG | ENST00000474221.5 | TSL:2 | n.4267T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 11 of 11 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.718 AC: 109188AN: 152064Hom.: 39439 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.742 AC: 46AN: 62Hom.: 19 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.750 AC XY: 30AN XY: 40 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.718 AC: 109267AN: 152182Hom.: 39469 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.716 AC XY: 53275AN XY: 74406 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at