rs1139417
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_001065.4(TNFRSF1A):c.36A>G(p.Pro12Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.405 in 1,613,612 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 135,701 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001065.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- TNF receptor 1-associated periodic fever syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Illumina
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNFRSF1A | NM_001065.4 | c.36A>G | p.Pro12Pro | synonymous_variant | Exon 1 of 10 | ENST00000162749.7 | NP_001056.1 | |
| TNFRSF1A | NR_144351.2 | n.298A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 1 of 9 | ||||
| TNFRSF1A | NM_001346091.2 | c.-135A>G | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 1 of 9 | NP_001333020.1 | |||
| TNFRSF1A | NM_001346092.2 | c.-542A>G | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 1 of 11 | NP_001333021.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.393 AC: 59765AN: 152026Hom.: 12096 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.374 AC: 93640AN: 250294 AF XY: 0.374 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.406 AC: 593442AN: 1461468Hom.: 123613 Cov.: 46 AF XY: 0.404 AC XY: 293957AN XY: 727038 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.393 AC: 59763AN: 152144Hom.: 12088 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.391 AC XY: 29083AN XY: 74394 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
- -
This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 59% of patients studied by a panel of primary immunodeficiencies. Number of patients: 57. Only high quality variants are reported. -
- -
- -
Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -
not provided Benign:3Other:1
Variant interpreted as Benign and reported on 04-27-2020 by Lab or GTR ID 500031. GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. This variant was reported in an individual referred for clinical diagnostic genetic testing. -
- -
- -
- -
TNF receptor-associated periodic fever syndrome (TRAPS) Benign:2
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
- -
Associated with severe COVID-19 disease Uncertain:1
- -
Susceptibility to severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) Uncertain:1
- -
Susceptibility to severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) due to high plasma levels of TNF, TNFR, and/or TNFR7 Uncertain:1
NA -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at