rs11539507
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_030662.4(MAP2K2):c.660C>A(p.Ile220=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.469 in 1,585,444 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 177,276 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. I220I) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_030662.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAP2K2 | NM_030662.4 | c.660C>A | p.Ile220= | synonymous_variant | 6/11 | ENST00000262948.10 | |
MAP2K2 | XM_006722799.3 | c.660C>A | p.Ile220= | synonymous_variant | 6/9 | ||
MAP2K2 | XM_047439100.1 | c.90C>A | p.Ile30= | synonymous_variant | 4/9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAP2K2 | ENST00000262948.10 | c.660C>A | p.Ile220= | synonymous_variant | 6/11 | 1 | NM_030662.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.429 AC: 65084AN: 151796Hom.: 14750 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.478 AC: 98773AN: 206634Hom.: 24022 AF XY: 0.473 AC XY: 52611AN XY: 111224
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.474 AC: 678786AN: 1433530Hom.: 162519 Cov.: 53 AF XY: 0.472 AC XY: 335045AN XY: 710580
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.429 AC: 65113AN: 151914Hom.: 14757 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.428 AC XY: 31804AN XY: 74244
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Sep 21, 2007 | - - |
RASopathy Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | - | Variant classified using ACMG guidelines - |
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel | May 09, 2017 | The filtering allele frequency of the c.660C>A (p.Ile220=) variant in the MAP2K2 gene is 65.271% (3631/5412) of Latino chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium, which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel (BA1; PMID:29493581) - |
Cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome 4 Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 29, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Sep 05, 2021 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 11, 2018 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at