rs11571641

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):​c.1395A>C​(p.Val465Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000621 in 1,611,462 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. V465V) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00025 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00066 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Likely benign reviewed by expert panel U:1B:26

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.143

Publications

11 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
BRCA2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
  • Fanconi anemia complementation group D1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, G2P
  • pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • sarcoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Fanconi anemia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • medulloblastoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).
BP6
Variant 13-32332873-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32332873-A-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 51116.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.143 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkc.1395A>C p.Val465Val synonymous_variant Exon 10 of 27 ENST00000380152.8 NP_000050.3 P51587

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkc.1395A>C p.Val465Val synonymous_variant Exon 10 of 27 5 NM_000059.4 ENSP00000369497.3 P51587
BRCA2ENST00000530893.7 linkc.1026A>C p.Val342Val synonymous_variant Exon 10 of 27 1 ENSP00000499438.2 A0A590UJI7
BRCA2ENST00000614259.2 linkn.1395A>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 9 of 26 2 ENSP00000506251.1 A0A7P0TAP7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000250
AC:
38
AN:
152226
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000724
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000188
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000485
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000250
AC:
62
AN:
248262
AF XY:
0.000268
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000620
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000927
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000514
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000166
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000660
AC:
963
AN:
1459236
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.000628
AC XY:
456
AN XY:
725734
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000180
AC:
6
AN:
33278
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000227
AC:
1
AN:
44142
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26020
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39678
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
85266
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000131
AC:
7
AN:
53378
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5746
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000837
AC:
930
AN:
1111454
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000315
AC:
19
AN:
60274
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.476
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
61
122
184
245
306
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
38
76
114
152
190
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000250
AC:
38
AN:
152226
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000336
AC XY:
25
AN XY:
74378
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000724
AC:
3
AN:
41464
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15276
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5204
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000188
AC:
2
AN:
10622
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
316
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000485
AC:
33
AN:
68038
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2094
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.497
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3
5
8
10
13
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000422
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000238
EpiCase
AF:
0.000600
EpiControl
AF:
0.000356

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:26
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:8
Mar 02, 2020
BRCAlab, Lund University
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 31, 2017
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 29, 2017
Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:curation

Synonymous substitution variant, with low bioinformatic likelihood to result in a splicing aberration (Splicing prior probability 0.02; http://priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS/). -

Apr 21, 2016
Michigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of Michigan
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 21, 2015
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 17, 2014
Counsyl
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:literature only

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

Dec 30, 1999
Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 05, 2024
All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:6
Mar 11, 2014
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Apr 18, 2017
Cancer Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer Agency
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 20, 2022
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The BRCA2 p.Val465Val variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict the abolishment of an existing splice site or the creation of a new splice site, and a splicing minigene assay found the variant did not have an effect on splicing (Théry 2011). The variant was identified in the literature in 2 of 8048 proband chromosomes from individuals or families with breast or ovarian cancer; however control chromosomes were not evaluated in this study thus the prevalence of the variant in the general population could not be determined (van der Hout 2006). Another variant with the same synonymous amino acid change but a different nucleotide change (c.1395A>T) was identified in one individual with breast cancer in a study by Evans (2008); however, control chromosomes were not included in this study. The p.Val465Val variant was identified in the NIH Polymorphism Discovery Resource (NIHPDR) PDR90 cohort in 1 of 180 chromosomes (frequency: 0.006), and in the Exome Variant Server Exome Sequencing Project in 4 of 13006 European American alleles (frequency 0.0003), increasing the likelihood that this may be a low frequency benign variant in certain populations of origin. The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs11571641) “With uncertain allele”, HGMD, LOVD, the ClinVar database (classified as benign by Invitae and GeneDx), the BIC database (1X with unknown clinical importance), and UMD (25X as a neutral variant). In UMD the variant was identified with three different co-occurring pathogenic BRCA2 variants and one pathogenic BRCA1 variant, increasing the likelihood that the p.Val465Val variant does not have clinical significance. Furthermore, Myriad classifies this as a polymorphism (personal communication). In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Jul 21, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:4
-
Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 17, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BRCA2: BP4, BP7 -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Aug 13, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Apr 10, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Apr 22, 2015
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:2
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 14, 2017
Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Medulloblastoma;C0346153:Familial cancer of breast;C0376358:Prostate cancer;C1838457:Fanconi anemia complementation group D1;C2675520:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2;C2751641:Glioma susceptibility 3;C3150546:Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1 Benign:1
Feb 17, 2022
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Dec 01, 2022
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

BRCA2-related disorder Benign:1
Mar 05, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.87
CADD
Benign
0.53
DANN
Benign
0.49
PhyloP100
0.14
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
Splicevardb
1.0
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs11571641; hg19: chr13-32907010; API