rs115940994

Positions:

chr2-148489641-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001378120.1(MBD5):c.4009A>G(p.Ile1337Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000345 in 1,614,208 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00037 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00034 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

MBD5
NM_001378120.1 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 8.31

Variant links:

Genes affected

MBD5 (HGNC:20444): (methyl-CpG binding domain protein 5) This gene encodes a member of the methyl-CpG-binding domain (MBD) family. The MBD consists of about 70 residues and is the minimal region required for a methyl-CpG-binding protein binding specifically to methylated DNA. In addition to the MBD domain, this protein contains a PWWP domain (Pro-Trp-Trp-Pro motif), which consists of 100-150 amino acids and is found in numerous proteins that are involved in cell division, growth and differentiation. Mutations in this gene cause an autosomal dominant type of cognitive disability. The encoded protein interacts with the polycomb repressive complex PR-DUB which catalyzes the deubiquitination of a lysine residue of histone 2A. Haploinsufficiency of this gene is associated with a syndrome involving microcephaly, intellectual disabilities, severe speech impairment, and seizures. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found, but their full-length nature is not determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2017]

MBD5 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.007761121).

BP6

Variant 2-148489641-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-148489641-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 138178.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000368 (56/152316) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0106 (55/5182). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00837. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 30 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 56 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MBD5	NM_001378120.1 linkuse as main transcript	c.4009A>G	p.Ile1337Val	missense_variant	11/14	ENST00000642680.2	NP_001365049.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
MBD5	ENST00000642680.2 linkuse as main transcript	c.4009A>G	p.Ile1337Val	missense_variant	11/14		NM_001378120.1	ENSP00000493871

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000368

AC:

AN:

152198

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.0106

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00103

AC:

260

AN:

251454

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000861

AC XY:

117

AN XY:

135894

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0140

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000326

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000343

AC:

501

AN:

1461892

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000308

AC XY:

224

AN XY:

727248

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0117

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000180

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000513

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000368

AC:

AN:

152316

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000403

AC XY:

AN XY:

74490

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.0106

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000473

Alfa

AF:

0.000646

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000525

ExAC

AF:

0.000980

AC:

119

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00260

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	not provided	Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics	-	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics	Jun 05, 2017	- -

not specified

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

Mar 26, 2014

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 1

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Jan 29, 2024

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Aug 07, 2017

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Pathogenic

0.71

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.38

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.30

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.067

T;.;.;T

Eigen

Uncertain

0.62

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.67

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.98

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.93

D;.;D;D

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0078

T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.1

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.97

L;.;.;.

MutationTaster

Benign

0.59

D;D

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.71

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.13

N;.;.;N

REVEL

Benign

0.21

Sift

Pathogenic

0.0

D;.;.;D

Sift4G

Benign

0.18

T;.;.;T

Polyphen

0.98

D;.;.;P

Vest4

0.60

MVP

0.17

MPC

0.13

ClinPred

0.20

GERP RS

5.4

Varity_R

0.24

gMVP

0.43

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over