rs12514417
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The ENST00000409134.8(ALDH7A1):c.1315A>C(p.Lys439Gln) variant causes a missense, splice region change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0959 in 1,609,982 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8,257 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000409134.8 missense, splice_region
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALDH7A1 | NM_001182.5 | c.1315A>C | p.Lys439Gln | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | 14/18 | ENST00000409134.8 | NP_001173.2 | |
ALDH7A1 | NM_001201377.2 | c.1231A>C | p.Lys411Gln | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | 14/18 | NP_001188306.1 | ||
ALDH7A1 | NM_001202404.2 | c.1123A>C | p.Lys375Gln | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | 12/16 | NP_001189333.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALDH7A1 | ENST00000409134.8 | c.1315A>C | p.Lys439Gln | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | 14/18 | 1 | NM_001182.5 | ENSP00000387123 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0874 AC: 13300AN: 152114Hom.: 705 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.114 AC: 28669AN: 251026Hom.: 2132 AF XY: 0.109 AC XY: 14722AN XY: 135658
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0968 AC: 141066AN: 1457750Hom.: 7546 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0956 AC XY: 69359AN XY: 725456
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0875 AC: 13322AN: 152232Hom.: 711 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0893 AC XY: 6645AN XY: 74430
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 11, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Unidad de Genómica Garrahan, Hospital de Pediatría Garrahan | Jul 15, 2024 | This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 20% of patients studied in a panel designed for Epileptic and Developmental Encephalopathy and Progressive Myoclonus Epilepsy. Number of patients: 19. Only high quality variants are reported. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. - |
Pyridoxine-dependent epilepsy Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 14, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | Nov 14, 2016 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 24, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at