rs140055438

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001291303.3(FAT4):​c.5987A>G​(p.Lys1996Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00113 in 1,613,814 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0024 ( 4 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0010 ( 6 hom. )

Consequence

FAT4
NM_001291303.3 missense

Scores

3
16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.35

Publications

4 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
FAT4 (HGNC:23109): (FAT atypical cadherin 4) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the protocadherin family. This gene may play a role in regulating planar cell polarity (PCP). Studies in mice suggest that loss of PCP signaling may cause cystic kidney disease, and mutations in this gene have been associated with Van Maldergem Syndrome 2. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been noted for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2014]
FAT4 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Hennekam lymphangiectasia-lymphedema syndrome 2
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • van Maldergem syndrome 2
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
  • multiple congenital anomalies/dysmorphic syndrome-intellectual disability
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • Hennekam syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • van Maldergem syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0068081915).
BP6
Variant 4-125414950-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr4-125414950-A-G is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 435175.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00239 (364/152254) while in subpopulation AMR AF = 0.00805 (123/15286). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00689. There are 4 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 181 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
FAT4NM_001291303.3 linkc.5987A>G p.Lys1996Arg missense_variant Exon 6 of 18 ENST00000394329.9 NP_001278232.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
FAT4ENST00000394329.9 linkc.5987A>G p.Lys1996Arg missense_variant Exon 6 of 18 5 NM_001291303.3 ENSP00000377862.4
FAT4ENST00000335110.5 linkc.881A>G p.Lys294Arg missense_variant Exon 5 of 15 1 ENSP00000335169.5
FAT4ENST00000674496.2 linkc.758A>G p.Lys253Arg missense_variant Exon 5 of 17 ENSP00000501473.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00239
AC:
364
AN:
152136
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00340
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00806
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000867
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00118
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00669
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00146
AC:
366
AN:
251014
AF XY:
0.00125
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00357
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00382
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00209
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00116
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00343
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00100
AC:
1465
AN:
1461560
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000967
AC XY:
703
AN XY:
727044
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00320
AC:
107
AN:
33468
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00387
AC:
173
AN:
44718
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00145
AC:
38
AN:
26124
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000252
AC:
1
AN:
39678
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000812
AC:
7
AN:
86252
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000187
AC:
1
AN:
53412
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00572
AC:
33
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000871
AC:
968
AN:
1111752
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00227
AC:
137
AN:
60390
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.485
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
85
171
256
342
427
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
34
68
102
136
170
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00239
AC:
364
AN:
152254
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00243
AC XY:
181
AN XY:
74442
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00339
AC:
141
AN:
41556
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00805
AC:
123
AN:
15286
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000867
AC:
3
AN:
3462
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5174
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10604
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00680
AC:
2
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00118
AC:
80
AN:
68022
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00662
AC:
14
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
17
34
51
68
85
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00150
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00300
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000539
AC:
2
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00104
AC:
4
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00386
AC:
17
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000930
AC:
8
ExAC
AF:
0.00118
AC:
143
EpiCase
AF:
0.00169
EpiControl
AF:
0.00166

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:5
Jan 23, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 02, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

FAT4: BP4, BS2 -

not specified Uncertain:1
Sep 14, 2016
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Mar 25, 2022
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

FAT4-related disorder Benign:1
Mar 09, 2020
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.068
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.61
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.65
CADD
Benign
13
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.071
T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.72
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.68
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.83
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.54
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.0076
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0068
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.90
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.14
N;.
PhyloP100
1.4
PrimateAI
Benign
0.29
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.1
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.064
Sift
Benign
0.29
T;T
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.034
D;D
Polyphen
0.93
P;B
Vest4
0.053
MVP
0.19
MPC
0.17
ClinPred
0.0087
T
GERP RS
2.9
Varity_R
0.023
gMVP
0.21
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs140055438; hg19: chr4-126336105; API