Menu
GeneBe

rs143719656

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_022098.4(XPNPEP3):c.590-8A>G variant causes a splice region, splice polypyrimidine tract, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00202 in 1,613,842 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0015 ( 2 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0021 ( 8 hom. )

Consequence

XPNPEP3
NM_022098.4 splice_region, splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00002867
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.464
Variant links:
Genes affected
XPNPEP3 (HGNC:28052): (X-prolyl aminopeptidase 3) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the family of X-pro-aminopeptidases that utilize a metal cofactor, and remove the N-terminal amino acid from peptides with a proline residue in the penultimate position. This protein has been shown to localize to the mitochondria of renal cells, and have a role in ciliary function. Mutations in this gene are associated with nephronophthisis-like nephropathy-1. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been noted for this gene, however, expression of some of these isoforms in vivo is not known.[provided by RefSeq, Mar 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).
BP6
Variant 22-40886305-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-40886305-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 167851.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=2, Likely_benign=1}. Variant chr22-40886305-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00149 (227/152238) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00263 (179/68018). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00232. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 89 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
XPNPEP3NM_022098.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.590-8A>G splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant ENST00000357137.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
XPNPEP3ENST00000357137.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.590-8A>G splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant 1 NM_022098.4 P1Q9NQH7-1
XPNPEP3ENST00000428799.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.*472-8A>G splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant, NMD_transcript_variant 2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00149
AC:
226
AN:
152120
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000410
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000721
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00375
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000377
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00263
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000480
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00137
AC:
345
AN:
250944
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.00129
AC XY:
175
AN XY:
135664
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000185
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000665
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00447
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000371
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00219
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00196
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00208
AC:
3038
AN:
1461604
Hom.:
8
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00209
AC XY:
1522
AN XY:
727110
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000209
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000827
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00440
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000139
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000488
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00246
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00157
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00149
AC:
227
AN:
152238
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00120
AC XY:
89
AN XY:
74438
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000409
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000720
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00375
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000377
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00263
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000475
Alfa
AF:
0.00196
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00146
EpiCase
AF:
0.00278
EpiControl
AF:
0.00202

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Feb 13, 2015- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Nephronophthisis-like nephropathy 1 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 08, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.86
Cadd
Benign
2.3
Dann
Benign
0.44

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000029
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs143719656; hg19: chr22-41282309; API