rs144036995
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 3P and 8B. PM1PP2BP4_ModerateBP6_ModerateBS1
The NM_000090.4(COL3A1):c.2723C>G(p.Ala908Gly) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000044 in 1,612,970 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A908V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000090.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal dominant Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, vascular typeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Genomics England PanelApp
- Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, vascular typeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- polymicrogyria with or without vascular-type Ehlers-Danlos syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152132Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000800 AC: 20AN: 250142 AF XY: 0.000111 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000465 AC: 68AN: 1460838Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000743 AC XY: 54AN XY: 726694 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152132Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000404 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74312 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at