rs150016625

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBS1_Supporting

The NM_005422.4(TECTA):c.4163G>A(p.Arg1388His) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000208 in 1,612,800 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1388C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00017 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00021 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

TECTA
NM_005422.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:1U:2B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.57

Publications

4 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

TECTA (HGNC:11720): (tectorin alpha) The tectorial membrane is an extracellular matrix of the inner ear that contacts the stereocilia bundles of specialized sensory hair cells. Sound induces movement of these hair cells relative to the tectorial membrane, deflects the stereocilia, and leads to fluctuations in hair-cell membrane potential, transducing sound into electrical signals. Alpha-tectorin is one of the major noncollagenous components of the tectorial membrane. Mutations in the TECTA gene have been shown to be responsible for autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing impairment and a recessive form of sensorineural pre-lingual non-syndromic deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

TECTA links:

TBCEL-TECTA (HGNC:54857): (TBCEL-TECTA readthrough) Predicted to enable alpha-tubulin binding activity. Predicted to be involved in microtubule cytoskeleton organization; post-chaperonin tubulin folding pathway; and tubulin complex assembly. Predicted to be active in cytoplasm. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

TBCEL-TECTA links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.19787249).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000171 (26/152284) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.00186 (9/4828). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000972. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 18 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TECTA	NM_005422.4 link	c.4163G>A	p.Arg1388His	missense_variant	Exon 13 of 24	ENST00000392793.6	NP_005413.2	O75443
TBCEL-TECTA	NM_001378761.1 link	c.5120G>A	p.Arg1707His	missense_variant	Exon 19 of 30		NP_001365690.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TECTA	ENST00000392793.6 link	c.4163G>A	p.Arg1388His	missense_variant	Exon 13 of 24	5	NM_005422.4	ENSP00000376543.1		O75443

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000177

AC:

AN:

152166

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000191

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000957

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000367

AC:

AN:

250892

AF XY:

0.000501

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000347

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000199

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000194

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00131

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000212

AC:

309

AN:

1460516

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000275

AC XY:

200

AN XY:

726248

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000299

AC:

AN:

33458

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000313

AC:

AN:

44702

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.0000765

AC:

AN:

26128

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39648

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00147

AC:

127

AN:

86232

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53224

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00503

AC:

AN:

5764

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000108

AC:

120

AN:

1111014

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000265

AC:

AN:

60346

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.495

Heterozygous variant carriers

100

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000171

AC:

AN:

152284

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000242

AC XY:

AN XY:

74464

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41560

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000131

AC:

AN:

15286

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5188

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00186

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10618

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000191

AC:

AN:

68014

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000947

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.499

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000237

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000159

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000349

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000354

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000866

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000436

EpiControl

AF:

0.000296

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Uncertain:2Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 21

Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1

Dec 12, 2024

Laboratory of Prof. Karen Avraham, Tel Aviv University

Significance:Pathogenic

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:research

The c.4163G>A:p.(Arg1388His) variant is classified pathogenic by the Deafness Variation Database based on PMID: 27610647. -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Dec 01, 2019

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 02, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 12

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.20

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.22

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.11

CADD

Pathogenic

(source)

DANN

Pathogenic

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.24

T;.;T

Eigen

Uncertain

0.56

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.59

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.95

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.96

.;D;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.071

MetaRNN

Benign

0.20

T;T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.54

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.90

L;.;L

PhyloP100

4.6

PrimateAI

Benign

0.47

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.85

N;.;N

REVEL

Uncertain

0.48

Sift

Benign

0.030

D;.;D

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.018

D;.;D

Polyphen

1.0

D;.;D

Vest4

0.57

MVP

0.92

MPC

1.1

ClinPred

0.12

GERP RS

5.3

Varity_R

0.11

gMVP

0.58

Mutation Taster

=50/50

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over