rs150925674
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_138694.4(PKHD1):āc.8581A>Gā(p.Ser2861Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00305 in 1,595,750 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 23 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_138694.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PKHD1 | NM_138694.4 | c.8581A>G | p.Ser2861Gly | missense_variant | 55/67 | ENST00000371117.8 | NP_619639.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PKHD1 | ENST00000371117.8 | c.8581A>G | p.Ser2861Gly | missense_variant | 55/67 | 1 | NM_138694.4 | ENSP00000360158 | P2 | |
PKHD1 | ENST00000340994.4 | c.8581A>G | p.Ser2861Gly | missense_variant | 55/61 | 5 | ENSP00000341097 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00325 AC: 494AN: 151902Hom.: 3 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00328 AC: 823AN: 250704Hom.: 7 AF XY: 0.00341 AC XY: 462AN XY: 135498
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00303 AC: 4378AN: 1443730Hom.: 20 Cov.: 26 AF XY: 0.00308 AC XY: 2214AN XY: 719496
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00325 AC: 494AN: 152020Hom.: 3 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00390 AC XY: 290AN XY: 74278
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:6
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 21, 2017 | Variant summary: The PKHD1 c.8581A>G (p.Ser2861Gly) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide and 2/3 in silico tools (SNPsandGO and Mutation Taster not captured due to low reliability index and p-value, respectively) predict a benign outcome for this variant. This variant was found in 1011/276778 control chromosomes, predominantly observed in the European (Finnish) subpopulation at a frequency of 0.019838 (509/25658). This frequency is about 3 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic PKHD1 variant (0.0070711), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of European (Finnish) origin. The variant of interest has been reported in multiple affected individuals including individuals that were compound heterozygotes for two pathogenic variants, further supporting the variant of interest being in the benign spectrum. The reports of its occurence in cis with another pathogenic variant in patients with a confirmed second disease causing variation, provides further supporting evidence in favor of its benign outcome. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as "likely benign/benign." Taken together, this variant is classified as Benign. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Mar 01, 2024 | PKHD1: BP4 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 20, 2021 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26695994, 19914852, 12874454, 27225849, 24162162, 23582048, 15805161, 15698423, 14741187, 26385851, 30507656) - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease Uncertain:1Benign:4
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics | May 31, 2018 | This variant is interpreted as a Likely Benign, for Polycystic kidney disease 4 with or without polycystic liver disease, in Autosomal Recessive manner. The following ACMG Tag(s) were applied: BP4 => Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc.). BS2 => Observed in a healthy adult individual for a recessive (homozygous), dominant (heterozygous), or X-linked (hemizygous) disorder, with full penetrance expected at an early age. - |
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Oct 28, 2015 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at