rs1800899
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000546.6(TP53):c.993+12T>C variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0134 in 1,613,726 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 169 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.016 ( 18 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.013 ( 151 hom. )
Consequence
TP53
NM_000546.6 intron
NM_000546.6 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.437
Genes affected
TP53 (HGNC:11998): (tumor protein p53) This gene encodes a tumor suppressor protein containing transcriptional activation, DNA binding, and oligomerization domains. The encoded protein responds to diverse cellular stresses to regulate expression of target genes, thereby inducing cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, senescence, DNA repair, or changes in metabolism. Mutations in this gene are associated with a variety of human cancers, including hereditary cancers such as Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Alternative splicing of this gene and the use of alternate promoters result in multiple transcript variants and isoforms. Additional isoforms have also been shown to result from the use of alternate translation initiation codons from identical transcript variants (PMIDs: 12032546, 20937277). [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
BP6
?
Variant 17-7673523-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-7673523-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 93325.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-7673523-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr17-7673523-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
?
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0156 (2381/152248) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0279 (1158/41538). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0265. There are 18 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 1076 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
?
High AC in GnomAd at 2376 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TP53 | NM_000546.6 | c.993+12T>C | intron_variant | ENST00000269305.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TP53 | ENST00000269305.9 | c.993+12T>C | intron_variant | 1 | NM_000546.6 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0156 AC: 2376AN: 152130Hom.: 16 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
2376
AN:
152130
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0111 AC: 2797AN: 251290Hom.: 21 AF XY: 0.0115 AC XY: 1566AN XY: 135810
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
2797
AN:
251290
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
1566
AN XY:
135810
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0132 AC: 19279AN: 1461478Hom.: 151 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0130 AC XY: 9432AN XY: 727060
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
19279
AN:
1461478
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
9432
AN XY:
727060
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0156 AC: 2381AN: 152248Hom.: 18 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0145 AC XY: 1076AN XY: 74450
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
2381
AN:
152248
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
1076
AN XY:
74450
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
25
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:29
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:9
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jan 11, 2013 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Aug 07, 2018 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | May 10, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 18, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 31, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Jul 12, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jun 18, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Vantari Genetics | Feb 04, 2016 | - - |
Li-Fraumeni syndrome 1 Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Sep 22, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jun 18, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | - - |
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 29, 2018 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30796655, 26270727) - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Apr 01, 2024 | TP53: BS1, BS2 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Genetics Program, Instituto Nacional de Cancer | Nov 01, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Apr 19, 2022 | - - |
Li-Fraumeni syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | May 19, 2021 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The TP53 c.993+12T>C, variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the Genesight-COGR, Cosmic, LOVD 3.0, IARC TP53 Database, UMD TP52 Mutation Database, Database of germline p53 mutations, databases. The variant was identified in dbSNP (rs: 1800899) “with likely benign allele”, ClinVar (5x as benign and 1x as likely benign) associated with the phenotypes of Li-Fraumeni syndrome and Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome, and the Clinvitae database. The variant was identified in control databases in 3159 of 277250 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.011394 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The variant was identified in the following populations at a frequency greater than 1%: African in 656 of 24036 chromosomes (freq: 0.027), European (Non-Finnish) in 1750 of 126732 chromosomes (freq: 0.014), South Asian in 321 of 30782 chromosomes (freq: 0.01). The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Benign
Dann
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at