rs188035979

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2

The NM_001429.4(EP300):c.6481A>G(p.Met2161Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000307 in 1,614,144 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00037 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00030 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

EP300
NM_001429.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.25

Publications

8 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

EP300 (HGNC:3373): (E1A binding protein p300) This gene encodes the adenovirus E1A-associated cellular p300 transcriptional co-activator protein. It functions as histone acetyltransferase that regulates transcription via chromatin remodeling and is important in the processes of cell proliferation and differentiation. It mediates cAMP-gene regulation by binding specifically to phosphorylated CREB protein. This gene has also been identified as a co-activator of HIF1A (hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha), and thus plays a role in the stimulation of hypoxia-induced genes such as VEGF. Defects in this gene are a cause of Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome and may also play a role in epithelial cancer. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

EP300 links:

EP300-AS1 (HGNC:50504): (EP300 antisense RNA 1)

EP300-AS1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0071241558).

BP6

Variant 22-41178192-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-41178192-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 134049.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 57 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
EP300	NM_001429.4 link	c.6481A>G	p.Met2161Val	missense_variant	Exon 31 of 31	ENST00000263253.9	NP_001420.2	Q09472Q7Z6C1
EP300	NM_001362843.2 link	c.6403A>G	p.Met2135Val	missense_variant	Exon 30 of 30		NP_001349772.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
EP300	ENST00000263253.9 link	c.6481A>G	p.Met2161Val	missense_variant	Exon 31 of 31	1	NM_001429.4	ENSP00000263253.7		Q09472

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000375

AC:

AN:

152144

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.0104

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000956

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000984

AC:

247

AN:

251024

AF XY:

0.000810

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000289

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0133

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000882

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000300

AC:

439

AN:

1461882

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000289

AC XY:

210

AN XY:

727240

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000224

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0102

AC:

404

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000232

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53408

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000719

AC:

AN:

1112012

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000397

AC:

AN:

60396

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.488

Heterozygous variant carriers

109

145

181

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000374

AC:

AN:

152262

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000349

AC XY:

AN XY:

74456

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41554

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15300

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0104

AC:

AN:

5168

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000207

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10618

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68004

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000946

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.492

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000240

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000597

ExAC

AF:

0.000857

AC:

104

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00318

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:5Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:1Other:1

Feb 08, 2013

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 19, 2013

ITMI

Significance:not provided

Review Status:no classification provided

Collection Method:reference population

- -

EP300-related disorder

Benign:1

Aug 09, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome due to EP300 haploinsufficiency

Benign:1

Dec 16, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2020

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Colorectal cancer;C3150941:Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome due to EP300 haploinsufficiency;C4551859:Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome due to CREBBP mutations;C5193035:Menke-Hennekam syndrome 2

Benign:1

Sep 29, 2021

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.085

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.35

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.26

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.92

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.51

Eigen

Benign

-0.50

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.35

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.87

LIST_S2

Benign

0.64

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0071

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.88

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.7

PhyloP100

1.3

PrimateAI

Benign

0.44

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.6

REVEL

Benign

0.18

Sift

Benign

0.089

Sift4G

Benign

0.30

Polyphen

0.0

Vest4

0.24

MVP

0.86

ClinPred

0.020

GERP RS

1.1

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Varity_R

0.12

gMVP

0.31

Mutation Taster

=99/1

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over