Menu
GeneBe

rs199598302

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):c.63876C>T(p.Asn21292=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00169 in 1,612,614 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 59 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0014 ( 4 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0017 ( 55 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:20

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.15
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.5).
BP6
Variant 2-178587335-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178587335-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 47199.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-178587335-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr2-178587335-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.14 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00142 (216/152038) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0274 (132/4816). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0236. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 130 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 4 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.63876C>T p.Asn21292= synonymous_variant 307/363 ENST00000589042.5
TTN-AS1NR_038272.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.3188+2342G>A intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.63876C>T p.Asn21292= synonymous_variant 307/3635 NM_001267550.2 P1
TTN-AS1ENST00000659121.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.417-10261G>A intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00138
AC:
209
AN:
151920
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00147
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000459
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0276
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000118
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00348
AC:
858
AN:
246692
Hom.:
15
AF XY:
0.00468
AC XY:
626
AN XY:
133848
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00156
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000204
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000200
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000114
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0264
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000808
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00117
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00172
AC:
2507
AN:
1460576
Hom.:
55
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00246
AC XY:
1784
AN XY:
726570
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00138
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000766
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000127
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0260
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000729
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00196
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00142
AC:
216
AN:
152038
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00175
AC XY:
130
AN XY:
74302
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00147
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000458
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0274
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000118
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00379
Alfa
AF:
0.000403
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000763
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0230
AC:
79
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:20
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineNov 20, 2014p.Asn18724Asn in exon 256 of TTN: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 2.9% (469/16064) of South Asian c hromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute .org). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpAug 19, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsSep 25, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxSep 30, 2014This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoApr 04, 2015- -
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 10, 2021- -
Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 10, 2021- -
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 10, 2021- -
Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 10, 2021- -
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 24, 2024- -
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioJan 06, 2016- -
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 29, 2019This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.50
Cadd
Benign
0.64
Dann
Benign
0.87

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs199598302; hg19: chr2-179452062; COSMIC: COSV100601173; COSMIC: COSV100601173; API