rs199993010

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_002691.4(POLD1):ā€‹c.371T>Cā€‹(p.Val124Ala) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000991 in 1,613,860 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V124G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.00018 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.000090 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

POLD1
NM_002691.4 missense

Scores

4
15

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.35
Variant links:
Genes affected
POLD1 (HGNC:9175): (DNA polymerase delta 1, catalytic subunit) This gene encodes the 125-kDa catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase delta. DNA polymerase delta possesses both polymerase and 3' to 5' exonuclease activity and plays a critical role in DNA replication and repair. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been observed for this gene, and a pseudogene of this gene is located on the long arm of chromosome 6. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.014473915).
BP6
Variant 19-50401832-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-50401832-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 220970.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=2, Benign=1}. Variant chr19-50401832-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 28 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
POLD1NM_002691.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.371T>C p.Val124Ala missense_variant 4/27 ENST00000440232.7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
POLD1ENST00000440232.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.371T>C p.Val124Ala missense_variant 4/271 NM_002691.4 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000184
AC:
28
AN:
152144
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000523
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00251
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000621
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00144
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000251
AC:
63
AN:
250722
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000221
AC XY:
30
AN XY:
135606
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000617
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00305
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000903
AC:
132
AN:
1461598
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.0000921
AC XY:
67
AN XY:
727128
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00194
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000186
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000360
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000563
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000184
AC:
28
AN:
152262
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000161
AC XY:
12
AN XY:
74456
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000523
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00252
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000621
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00142
Alfa
AF:
0.000204
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000159
ExAC
AF:
0.000247
AC:
30
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoDec 29, 2018- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 04, 2017This variant is denoted POLD1 c.371T>C at the cDNA level, p.Val124Ala (V124A) at the protein level, and results in the change of a Valine to an Alanine (GTG>GCG). This variant has not, to our knowledge, been published in the literature as a germline variant; however, it has been reported as a somatic variant in a lung tumor (Jiang 2016). POLD1 Val124Ala was observed at an allele frequency of 0.3% (56/18,862) in individuals of East Asian ancestry in large population cohorts (Lek 2016). This variant is not located in a known functional domain. In silico analyses, including protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, support a deleterious effect. Based on currently available evidence, it is unclear whether POLD1 Val124Ala is a pathogenic or benign variant. We consider it to be a variant of uncertain significance. -
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpOct 20, 2021- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Carcinoma of colon Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The POLD1 p.Val124Ala variant was not identified in the literature. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs199993010) as "With other allele", and in ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Invitae, Ambry Genetics and one clinical laboratory; as uncertain significance by GeneDx).The variant was identified in control databases in 63 of 276530 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0002 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 1 of 23974 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004), East Asian in 56 of 18862 chromosomes (freq: 0.003), and South Asian in 6 of 30780 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), while the variant was not observed in the Other, Latino, European, Ashkenazi Jewish, and Finnish populations. The p.Val124 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
POLD1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesMay 16, 2019This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 10 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJun 28, 2015This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.49
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.43
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.39
CADD
Benign
23
DANN
Benign
0.78
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.76
D;.;.;.;D
Eigen
Benign
-0.42
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.35
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.90
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.82
.;.;T;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.015
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.014
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.5
L;.;.;.;L
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.47
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.7
D;.;.;.;.
REVEL
Benign
0.22
Sift
Benign
0.17
T;.;.;.;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.19
T;T;D;T;T
Polyphen
0.011
B;.;.;.;B
Vest4
0.41
MVP
0.55
MPC
0.29
ClinPred
0.077
T
GERP RS
4.0
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.0
Varity_R
0.42
gMVP
0.53

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs199993010; hg19: chr19-50905089; API