Menu
GeneBe

rs200821009

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS1

The NM_005422.4(TECTA):c.2967C>A(p.His989Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000545 in 1,613,978 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000099 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000050 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

TECTA
NM_005422.4 missense

Scores

5
7
6

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0640
Variant links:
Genes affected
TECTA (HGNC:11720): (tectorin alpha) The tectorial membrane is an extracellular matrix of the inner ear that contacts the stereocilia bundles of specialized sensory hair cells. Sound induces movement of these hair cells relative to the tectorial membrane, deflects the stereocilia, and leads to fluctuations in hair-cell membrane potential, transducing sound into electrical signals. Alpha-tectorin is one of the major noncollagenous components of the tectorial membrane. Mutations in the TECTA gene have been shown to be responsible for autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing impairment and a recessive form of sensorineural pre-lingual non-syndromic deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.072065145).
BP6
Variant 11-121137446-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-121137446-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 505413.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=2, Likely_benign=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000986 (15/152092) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00295 (15/5084). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00182. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 10 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
TECTANM_005422.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.2967C>A p.His989Gln missense_variant 11/24 ENST00000392793.6
TBCEL-TECTANM_001378761.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.3924C>A p.His1308Gln missense_variant 17/30

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
TECTAENST00000392793.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.2967C>A p.His989Gln missense_variant 11/245 NM_005422.4 P4
TECTAENST00000264037.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.2967C>A p.His989Gln missense_variant 10/231 P4
TECTAENST00000642222.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.2967C>A p.His989Gln missense_variant 11/24 A1
TECTAENST00000645008.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.276C>A p.His92Gln missense_variant 2/15

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000987
AC:
15
AN:
151974
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00294
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000151
AC:
38
AN:
251114
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000169
AC XY:
23
AN XY:
135694
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00207
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000499
AC:
73
AN:
1461886
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000550
AC XY:
40
AN XY:
727246
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00169
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000360
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000331
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000986
AC:
15
AN:
152092
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000135
AC XY:
10
AN XY:
74342
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00295
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000652
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000567
ExAC
AF:
0.000140
AC:
17
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 07, 2023Identified in patients with sensorineural hearing loss in published literature, however the hearing loss may have been due to a variant in a different gene in all cases (Ishikawa et al., 2014; Santos-Cortez et al., 2021); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24655070, 33924653, 21520338, 31554319, 9590290) -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeNov 28, 2022- -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineDec 06, 2016Variant classified as Uncertain Significance - Favor Benign. The p.His989Gln var iant in TECTA has been reported in 1 Japanese family with hearing loss; however, the hearing loss was likely due to a variant in a different gene (Ishikawa 2014 ). This variant has been identified in 0.2% of East Asian chromosomes by the Ex ome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs200821 009). Computational prediction tools and conservation analysis suggest that the p.His989Gln variant may impact the protein, though this information is not predi ctive enough to determine pathogenicity. In summary, while the clinical signific ance of the p.His989Gln variant is uncertain, these data suggest that it is more likely to be benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.61
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.080
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.11
Cadd
Benign
18
Dann
Uncertain
0.98
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.75
D;.;D
Eigen
Benign
-0.35
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.51
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.93
D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.36
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.072
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.50
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.8
L;.;L
MutationTaster
Benign
0.69
D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.71
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-6.7
D;.;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.50
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D;.;D
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0
D;.;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;.;D
Vest4
0.81
MutPred
0.41
Gain of disorder (P = 0.0973);Gain of disorder (P = 0.0973);Gain of disorder (P = 0.0973);
MVP
0.72
MPC
1.1
ClinPred
0.43
T
GERP RS
-3.3
Varity_R
0.91
gMVP
0.82

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs200821009; hg19: chr11-121008155; API