rs202218948

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_201596.3(CACNB2):​c.1696G>A​(p.Ala566Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000368 in 1,614,016 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00027 ( 0 hom., cov: 30)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00038 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

CACNB2
NM_201596.3 missense

Scores

1
9
9

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 8.02

Publications

4 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CACNB2 (HGNC:1402): (calcium voltage-gated channel auxiliary subunit beta 2) This gene encodes a subunit of a voltage-dependent calcium channel protein that is a member of the voltage-gated calcium channel superfamily. The gene product was originally identified as an antigen target in Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, an autoimmune disorder. Mutations in this gene are associated with Brugada syndrome. Alternatively spliced variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2013]
CACNB2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Brugada syndrome 4
    Inheritance: AD, Unknown Classification: LIMITED, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
  • Brugada syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
  • hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
  • short QT syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.012707442).
BP6
Variant 10-18539437-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-18539437-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 190731.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 41 AD,Unknown gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CACNB2NM_201596.3 linkc.1696G>A p.Ala566Thr missense_variant Exon 14 of 14 ENST00000324631.13 NP_963890.2 Q08289-1
CACNB2NM_201590.3 linkc.1534G>A p.Ala512Thr missense_variant Exon 13 of 13 ENST00000377329.10 NP_963884.2 Q08289-3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CACNB2ENST00000324631.13 linkc.1696G>A p.Ala566Thr missense_variant Exon 14 of 14 1 NM_201596.3 ENSP00000320025.8 Q08289-1
CACNB2ENST00000377329.10 linkc.1534G>A p.Ala512Thr missense_variant Exon 13 of 13 1 NM_201590.3 ENSP00000366546.4 Q08289-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000270
AC:
41
AN:
152058
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000918
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00437
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000784
AC:
197
AN:
251246
AF XY:
0.000942
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000123
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000723
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000199
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000163
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000792
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000815
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000378
AC:
553
AN:
1461840
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000516
AC XY:
375
AN XY:
727220
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000299
AC:
1
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000827
AC:
37
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39686
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00486
AC:
419
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00277
AC:
16
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000504
AC:
56
AN:
1111982
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000397
AC:
24
AN:
60392
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.459
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
36
72
109
145
181
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000269
AC:
41
AN:
152176
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000323
AC XY:
24
AN XY:
74414
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000481
AC:
2
AN:
41550
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000917
AC:
14
AN:
15268
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5166
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00437
AC:
21
AN:
4804
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10608
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000588
AC:
4
AN:
68002
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2104
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.510
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3
6
8
11
14
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0000818
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000162
ExAC
AF:
0.000815
AC:
99
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00173
AC:
6
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000218
EpiControl
AF:
0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
May 22, 2017
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The CACNB2 c.1534G>A (p.Ala512Thr) variant involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. 3/4 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant (SNPsandGO not captured due to low reliability index). This variant was found in the large control database ExAC in 99 of 121336 control chromosomes (1 homozygote) of all ethnicities, but was predominantly observed in the South Asian subpopulation at a frequency of 0.005088 (84/16510; 1 homozygote). This frequency is about 509 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic CACNB2 variant (0.00001), providing strong evidence this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of South Asian origin. Two clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases have classified this variant as one of uncertain significance, though one was submitted prior to the release of the ExAC database. Taken together, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Jun 24, 2013
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

- -

not specified Benign:1
Mar 09, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Brugada syndrome 4 Benign:1
Jan 26, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Jul 05, 2018
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.099
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.21
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
-0.070
CADD
Uncertain
23
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.18
T;.;T;.;.;.;T;T;.;.;.;T;.;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.41
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.53
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.98
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.87
D;D;D;.;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.034
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.013
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.071
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.1
M;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
PhyloP100
8.0
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.52
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.96
N;N;N;.;.;N;.;.;N;N;N;.;N;.
REVEL
Benign
0.27
Sift
Uncertain
0.021
D;D;D;.;.;D;.;.;D;D;D;.;D;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.33
T;T;T;.;.;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;.
Polyphen
0.85
P;P;D;.;.;P;.;.;.;P;P;.;.;.
Vest4
0.47
MVP
0.86
MPC
0.31
ClinPred
0.038
T
GERP RS
5.9
Varity_R
0.11
gMVP
0.26
Mutation Taster
=98/2
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs202218948; hg19: chr10-18828366; API