Menu
GeneBe

rs2070489

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001106.4(ACVR2B):ā€‹c.333A>Gā€‹(p.Glu111=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.589 in 1,613,688 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 283,905 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.52 ( 21882 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes š‘“: 0.60 ( 262023 hom. )

Consequence

ACVR2B
NM_001106.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.44
Variant links:
Genes affected
ACVR2B (HGNC:174): (activin A receptor type 2B) Activins are dimeric growth and differentiation factors which belong to the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) superfamily of structurally related signaling proteins. Activins signal through a heteromeric complex of receptor serine kinases which include at least two type I (I and IB) and two type II (II and IIB) receptors. These receptors are all transmembrane proteins, composed of a ligand-binding extracellular domain with cysteine-rich region, a transmembrane domain, and a cytoplasmic domain with predicted serine/threonine specificity. Type I receptors are essential for signaling; and type II receptors are required for binding ligands and for expression of type I receptors. Type I and II receptors form a stable complex after ligand binding, resulting in phosphorylation of type I receptors by type II receptors. Type II receptors are considered to be constitutively active kinases. This gene encodes activin A type IIB receptor, which displays a 3- to 4-fold higher affinity for the ligand than activin A type II receptor. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.54).
BP6
Variant 3-38477933-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-38477933-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 257468.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr3-38477933-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.44 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.615 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
ACVR2BNM_001106.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.333A>G p.Glu111= synonymous_variant 3/11 ENST00000352511.5

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
ACVR2BENST00000352511.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.333A>G p.Glu111= synonymous_variant 3/111 NM_001106.4 P1Q13705-1
ACVR2BENST00000461232.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.4122A>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 2/101
ACVR2BENST00000465020.5 linkuse as main transcriptn.337A>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 3/102

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.523
AC:
79342
AN:
151826
Hom.:
21878
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.346
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.486
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.543
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.563
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.463
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.573
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.555
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.510
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.620
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.533
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.565
AC:
141862
AN:
251146
Hom.:
40827
AF XY:
0.572
AC XY:
77660
AN XY:
135840
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.347
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.533
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.557
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.469
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.579
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.559
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.619
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.575
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.596
AC:
870869
AN:
1461744
Hom.:
262023
Cov.:
66
AF XY:
0.596
AC XY:
433725
AN XY:
727186
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.333
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.534
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.554
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.467
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.581
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.567
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.616
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.571
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.522
AC:
79382
AN:
151944
Hom.:
21882
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.520
AC XY:
38626
AN XY:
74242
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.346
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.542
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.563
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.462
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.573
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.555
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.620
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.532
Alfa
AF:
0.591
Hom.:
51533
Bravo
AF:
0.510
Asia WGS
AF:
0.522
AC:
1814
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.603
EpiControl
AF:
0.607

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Heterotaxy, visceral, 4, autosomal Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 14, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterSep 21, 2015- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not specified Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 28, 2016Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.54
CADD
Benign
8.8
DANN
Benign
0.63

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2070489; hg19: chr3-38519424; COSMIC: COSV61702341; API