rs267607079
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 18 ACMG points: 18P and 0B. PM1_StrongPP3PP2PM2PS4_ModeratePS1PS2
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.1656G>T (p.Arg552Ser) variant in SOS1 has been reported as a confirmed de novo occurrence in one patient and 2 other probands with clinical features of a RASopathy (PS2, PS4_Moderate; PMID 17586837, 18854871). Of note, one of these cases was an affected mother-child duo (PP1 not met; PMID:17586837). This variant was absent from large population studies (PM2; gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This amino acid residue has been designated as a hotspot. These variants would have received PM5_Strong but the RAS EP decided that PM1 and PM5 cannot be used simultaneously and therefore this rule has been upgraded with expert judgement (PM1_Strong). Of note, the p.Arg552Ser variant in SOS1 has also been a consequence of the c.1656G>C nucleotide change which has been classified as pathogenic (PS1; ClinVar ID 12872). Computational prediction tools and conservation analysis suggest that the p.Arg552Ser variant may impact the protein (PP3). The variant is located in the SOS1 gene, which has been defined by the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel as a gene with a low rate of benign missense variants and pathogenic missense variants are common (PP2; PMID:29493581). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as pathogenic for RASopathies in an autosomal dominant manner. Rasopathy-specific ACMG/AMP criteria applied (PMID:29493581): PS2, PS1, PM1_Strong, PM2, PS4_Moderate, PP2, PP3. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA261730/MONDO:0021060/004
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005633.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Noonan syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- Noonan syndrome 4Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, PanelApp Australia, Genomics England PanelApp
- fibromatosis, gingival, 1Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- hereditary gingival fibromatosisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- cardiofaciocutaneous syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
- Costello syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
- Noonan syndrome with multiple lentiginesInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
- Noonan syndrome-like disorder with loose anagen hairInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 18 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_005633.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOS1 | MANE Select | c.1656G>T | p.Arg552Ser | missense | Exon 10 of 23 | NP_005624.2 | |||
| SOS1 | c.1635G>T | p.Arg545Ser | missense | Exon 10 of 23 | NP_001369323.1 | ||||
| SOS1 | c.1656G>T | p.Arg552Ser | missense | Exon 10 of 22 | NP_001369324.1 | G5E9C8 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOS1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1656G>T | p.Arg552Ser | missense | Exon 10 of 23 | ENSP00000384675.2 | Q07889-1 | ||
| SOS1 | TSL:5 | c.1656G>T | p.Arg552Ser | missense | Exon 10 of 22 | ENSP00000378479.2 | G5E9C8 | ||
| SOS1 | c.1656G>T | p.Arg552Ser | missense | Exon 10 of 22 | ENSP00000583860.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461482Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727056 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at