Menu
GeneBe

rs28897716

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_Strong

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.2803G>A(p.Asp935Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00116 in 1,613,826 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D935H) has been classified as Benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00064 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0012 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

1
2
13

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:31O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.312
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.11293295).
BP6
Variant 13-32337158-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32337158-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 51349.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr13-32337158-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr13-32337158-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.2803G>A p.Asp935Asn missense_variant 11/27 ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.2803G>A p.Asp935Asn missense_variant 11/275 NM_000059.4 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000651
AC:
99
AN:
152172
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000338
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000985
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000955
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000606
AC:
152
AN:
250844
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000590
AC XY:
80
AN XY:
135682
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000247
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000493
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000199
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000462
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00110
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000491
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00121
AC:
1767
AN:
1461536
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00115
AC XY:
839
AN XY:
727068
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000209
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000582
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000383
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000562
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00150
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000928
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000644
AC:
98
AN:
152290
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000604
AC XY:
45
AN XY:
74468
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000313
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000985
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000945
Alfa
AF:
0.000991
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000865
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00162
AC:
6
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00259
AC:
10
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000931
AC:
8
ExAC
AF:
0.000560
AC:
68
EpiCase
AF:
0.00104
EpiControl
AF:
0.00130

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:31Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Benign:10
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetics and Molecular Pathology, SA PathologyFeb 18, 2020- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)May 29, 2002- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center UtrechtOct 09, 2014- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterliterature onlyCounsylJan 02, 2014- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaOct 17, 2018This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthFeb 05, 2024- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)May 01, 2012- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterSep 21, 2015- -
not specified Benign:7Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Sep 10, 2014- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 06, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 28, 2016Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Multiple publications classify as VUS/not pathogenic; ExAC: 0.1% (57/66390) European chromosomes -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoDec 16, 2021- -
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenFeb 01, 2024BRCA2: BP1, BP4 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesSep 12, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesAug 15, 2017- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Jul 02, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthApr 22, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 19, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchGenetics Program, Instituto Nacional de CancerNov 01, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.Nov 21, 2023- -
Medulloblastoma;C0346153:Familial cancer of breast;C0376358:Malignant tumor of prostate;C1838457:Fanconi anemia complementation group D1;C2675520:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2;C2751641:Glioma susceptibility 3;C3150546:Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsMar 04, 2022- -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioFeb 07, 2023- -
Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaOct 17, 2018This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The BRCA2, EXON11, c.2803G>A, p.Asp935Asn variant was identified in 5 of 5884 chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from individuals with breast, ovarian or prostate cancer and was absent in 208 control chromosomes (Beetstra 2006, Capanu 2011, Edwards 2003, Soegaard 2008, Wagner 1999); however, an insufficient number of controls were included in these studies to determine the frequency of this variant in the general population. The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID:rs28897716) “With non-pathogenic allele”, HGMD, LOVD, the BIC database (106X as a variant with no clinical importance), and UMD (53X as a neutral variant). In UMD, the variant was listed as co-occurring with four different pathogenic BRCA2 mutations and one pathogenic BRCA1 mutation, increasing the likelihood that this variant does not have clinical significance. In addition, Spurdle (2008) identified a homozygote with the variant who did not have clinical features of Fanconi anemia, further suggesting that this variant is neutral. In addition, the variant was listed in the 1000 Genomes Project with a frequency of 0.0005 and in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project with frequency of 0.0007, increasing the likelihood that this may be a low frequency benign variant in certain populations of origin. The p.Asp935 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein. Furthermore, three in silico studies predicted the variant to have no clinical significance or effect on risk (Capanu 2011, Lindor 2012, Moghadasi 2013). In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.083
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.35
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.33
Cadd
Benign
13
Dann
Uncertain
0.99
Eigen
Benign
-0.86
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.91
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.060
N
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.53
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.11
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.27
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.6
D;D
REVEL
Benign
0.092
Sift
Benign
0.043
D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.090
T;T
Vest4
0.44
MVP
0.85
MPC
0.027
ClinPred
0.015
T
GERP RS
-0.46
gMVP
0.16

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.050
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs28897716; hg19: chr13-32911295; COSMIC: COSV104701327; COSMIC: COSV104701327; API