rs34398445

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001378454.1(ALMS1):ā€‹c.10272G>Cā€‹(p.Lys3424Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00107 in 1,614,004 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 18 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 11/16 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0054 ( 8 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00061 ( 10 hom. )

Consequence

ALMS1
NM_001378454.1 missense

Scores

14

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.238
Variant links:
Genes affected
ALMS1 (HGNC:428): (ALMS1 centrosome and basal body associated protein) This gene encodes a protein containing a large tandem-repeat domain as well as additional low complexity regions. The encoded protein functions in microtubule organization, particularly in the formation and maintanance of cilia. Mutations in this gene cause Alstrom syndrome. There is a pseudogene for this gene located adjacent in the same region of chromosome 2. Alternative splice variants have been described but their full length nature has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.005229473).
BP6
Variant 2-73559030-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-73559030-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 240972.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00539 (821/152232) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0185 (770/41528). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0175. There are 8 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 342 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 8 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
ALMS1NM_001378454.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.10272G>C p.Lys3424Asn missense_variant 15/23 ENST00000613296.6
ALMS1NM_015120.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.10275G>C p.Lys3425Asn missense_variant 15/23

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
ALMS1ENST00000613296.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.10272G>C p.Lys3424Asn missense_variant 15/231 NM_001378454.1 P3Q8TCU4-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00538
AC:
819
AN:
152116
Hom.:
8
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0186
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00196
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000621
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00574
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00136
AC:
339
AN:
249296
Hom.:
4
AF XY:
0.000828
AC XY:
112
AN XY:
135234
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0197
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000579
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000973
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000331
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000614
AC:
898
AN:
1461772
Hom.:
10
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000542
AC XY:
394
AN XY:
727188
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0216
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000872
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000580
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000396
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00128
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00539
AC:
821
AN:
152232
Hom.:
8
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00459
AC XY:
342
AN XY:
74456
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0185
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00196
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000829
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00568
Alfa
AF:
0.000948
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00625
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0183
AC:
69
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000122
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.00175
AC:
211
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00231
AC:
8
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000218
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpFeb 06, 2017Variant summary: The ALMS1 c.10269G>C (p.Lys3423Asn, alternative name c.10275G>C) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide and is predicted to be benign by 3/5 in silico tools. This variant was found in 211/120598 control chromosomes (including four homozygotes), predominantly observed in the African subpopulation at a frequency of 0.019804 (194/9796). This frequency is about 9 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic ALMS1 variant (0.0022361), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of African origin. It has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals in literature. One clinical diagnostic laboratory has classified this variant as benign. Taken together this variant is classified as benign variant. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 21, 2016p.Lys3423Asn in exon 15 of ALMS1: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 3.03% (40/1322) of African chromo somes by the 1000 Genomes Project (Phase 3; dbSNP rs34398445). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 27, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and ClinicsSep 01, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsMay 24, 2018- -
Alstrom syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchClinical Genomics, Uppaluri K&H Personalized Medicine Clinic-Potent mutations in ALMS1 are associated with a rare condition called Alstrom syndrome. It can cause excessive eating, insulin resistance. However, no evidence is found to ascertain the role of rs34398445 in Alstrom syndrome yet. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Dec 05, 2019- -
Monogenic diabetes Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchPersonalized Diabetes Medicine Program, University of Maryland School of MedicineOct 12, 2018ACMG criteria: BP1 (disease caused by truncating variants), BA1 (1.9% in gnomAD African), BS2 (6 homozygotes in gnomAD African), BP4 (7 predictors + REVEL 0.039)= benign -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsDec 24, 2018This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.16
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.66
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.71
CADD
Benign
9.9
DANN
Benign
0.90
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.014
T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.1
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.2
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.013
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.52
T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0052
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.95
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.36
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.11
T;T;T
Vest4
0.25
MVP
0.061
ClinPred
0.0044
T
GERP RS
-1.5
Varity_R
0.030
gMVP
0.038

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs34398445; hg19: chr2-73786157; API