rs35907255

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_014140.4(SMARCAL1):​c.423T>C​(p.Tyr141Tyr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0115 in 1,613,408 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 147 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0092 ( 9 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.012 ( 138 hom. )

Consequence

SMARCAL1
NM_014140.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0690

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SMARCAL1 (HGNC:11102): (SWI/SNF related, matrix associated, actin dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily a like 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the SWI/SNF family of proteins. Members of this family have helicase and ATPase activities and are thought to regulate transcription of certain genes by altering the chromatin structure around those genes. The encoded protein shows sequence similarity to the E. coli RNA polymerase-binding protein HepA. Mutations in this gene are a cause of Schimke immunoosseous dysplasia (SIOD), an autosomal recessive disorder with the diagnostic features of spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia, renal dysfunction, and T-cell immunodeficiency. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
SMARCAL1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Schimke immuno-osseous dysplasia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.91).
BP6
Variant 2-216415127-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-216415127-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 260344.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.069 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0092 (1402/152348) while in subpopulation AMR AF = 0.015 (230/15304). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0134. There are 9 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 657 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 9 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SMARCAL1NM_014140.4 linkc.423T>C p.Tyr141Tyr synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 18 ENST00000357276.9 NP_054859.2
SMARCAL1NM_001127207.2 linkc.423T>C p.Tyr141Tyr synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 18 NP_001120679.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SMARCAL1ENST00000357276.9 linkc.423T>C p.Tyr141Tyr synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 18 2 NM_014140.4 ENSP00000349823.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00921
AC:
1402
AN:
152230
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00256
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0150
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0150
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0101
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00282
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0158
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0132
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0148
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00969
AC:
2435
AN:
251164
AF XY:
0.0106
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00203
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00773
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0114
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00366
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0136
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0131
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0117
AC:
17086
AN:
1461060
Hom.:
138
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0118
AC XY:
8593
AN XY:
726790
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00198
AC:
66
AN:
33364
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00883
AC:
394
AN:
44608
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0110
AC:
288
AN:
26118
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000756
AC:
3
AN:
39692
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0104
AC:
895
AN:
86240
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00479
AC:
256
AN:
53414
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0154
AC:
89
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0129
AC:
14389
AN:
1111508
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0117
AC:
706
AN:
60348
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.488
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1037
2075
3112
4150
5187
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
514
1028
1542
2056
2570
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00920
AC:
1402
AN:
152348
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00882
AC XY:
657
AN XY:
74492
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00255
AC:
106
AN:
41588
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0150
AC:
230
AN:
15304
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0150
AC:
52
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0102
AC:
49
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00282
AC:
30
AN:
10626
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0170
AC:
5
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0132
AC:
899
AN:
68030
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0147
AC:
31
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.506
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
73
147
220
294
367
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0115
Hom.:
23
Bravo
AF:
0.00968
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00231
AC:
8
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0144
EpiControl
AF:
0.0149

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Schimke immuno-osseous dysplasia Benign:5
Jun 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 14, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Apr 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

SMARCAL1: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 -

Feb 09, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis Benign:1
Dec 01, 2019
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.91
CADD
Benign
1.1
DANN
Benign
0.70
PhyloP100
-0.069
PromoterAI
0.038
Neutral
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs35907255; hg19: chr2-217279850; API