rs376898963
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_004004.6(GJB2):c.493C>T(p.Arg165Trp) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000208 in 1,614,022 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00014 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00021 ( 2 hom. )
Consequence
GJB2
NM_004004.6 missense
NM_004004.6 missense
Scores
5
8
5
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 6.68
Genes affected
GJB2 (HGNC:4284): (gap junction protein beta 2) This gene encodes a member of the gap junction protein family. The gap junctions were first characterized by electron microscopy as regionally specialized structures on plasma membranes of contacting adherent cells. These structures were shown to consist of cell-to-cell channels that facilitate the transfer of ions and small molecules between cells. The gap junction proteins, also known as connexins, purified from fractions of enriched gap junctions from different tissues differ. According to sequence similarities at the nucleotide and amino acid levels, the gap junction proteins are divided into two categories, alpha and beta. Mutations in this gene are responsible for as much as 50% of pre-lingual, recessive deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
PM1
?
In a hotspot region, there are 5 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 1 benign, 8 uncertain in NM_004004.6
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.019080848).
BP6
?
Variant 13-20189089-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-20189089-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 177736.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=3, Likely_benign=8, Benign=1}.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GJB2 | NM_004004.6 | c.493C>T | p.Arg165Trp | missense_variant | 2/2 | ENST00000382848.5 | |
GJB2 | XM_011535049.3 | c.493C>T | p.Arg165Trp | missense_variant | 2/2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GJB2 | ENST00000382848.5 | c.493C>T | p.Arg165Trp | missense_variant | 2/2 | 1 | NM_004004.6 | P1 | |
GJB2 | ENST00000382844.2 | c.493C>T | p.Arg165Trp | missense_variant | 1/1 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.000158 AC: 24AN: 152176Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
24
AN:
152176
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000581 AC: 146AN: 251098Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000648 AC XY: 88AN XY: 135730
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
146
AN:
251098
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
88
AN XY:
135730
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000215 AC: 314AN: 1461728Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000263 AC XY: 191AN XY: 727158
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
314
AN:
1461728
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
191
AN XY:
727158
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.000144 AC: 22AN: 152294Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000201 AC XY: 15AN XY: 74466
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
22
AN:
152294
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
15
AN XY:
74466
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Bravo
AF:
ExAC
?
AF:
AC:
80
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Nov 19, 2014 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | May 17, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 05, 2021 | Observed as heterozygous variant without a second pathogenic variant in multiple individuals with hearing loss but also in unaffected relatives in published literature (Rickard et al., 2001; Putcha et al., 2007; Vanniya et al., 2017; Gurtler et al., 2008; Amritkumar et al., 2018); Located in the second extracellular domain of Cx26; In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports a deleterious effect; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 32425985, 31992338, 30245029, 20863150, 29542069, 29148562, 16950989, 12746422, 20234132, 17666888, 18607988, 20086306, 18941476, 29921236, 25388846, 11494963, 15617550) - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 1A Uncertain:1Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Pars Genome Lab | May 18, 2021 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Jul 14, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | May 02, 2018 | Variant summary: GJB2 c.493C>T (p.Arg165Trp) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the cysteine-rich domain (IPR019570) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00066 in 121246 control chromosomes (ExAC), predominantly observed within the South Asian subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0046, including 2 homozygotes. This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in GJB2 causing Autosomal Recessive Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss (0.00066 vs 0.025), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. The variant, c.493C>T, has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss (NSHL) (Rickard 2001, Gurtler 2008, RamShankar 2003, Hamid 2009), however in none of these cases was a second allele identified. In addition, Santos_2005, reports two families in which affected individuals do not carry the variant of interest, showing lack of cosegregation. At least one publication reported experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function, demonstrating the constriction of the channel pore in an intercellular dye transfer experiment (Xiao 2011). This defect might prevent the transmission of biochemically active molecules between cells, however, its implication in the pathomechanism is currently not clarified, and therefore this result does not allow convincing conclusions about the variant effect. A ClinVar submission from a clinical diagnostic laboratory (evaluation after 2014) cites the variant as "likely benign." Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Dec 06, 2014 | p.Arg165Trp in exon 2 of GJB2: This variant has been identified in 7 individuals with hearing loss (Rickard 2001, Putcha 2007, Santos 2005); however several of these individuals did not carry a second GJB2 variant. This variant is not expec ted to have clinical significance because it is has been identified in 0.4% (77/ 16,586) of South Asian chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (http://e xac.broadinstitute.org/;dbSNP rs376898963). - |
Ichthyosis, hystrix-like, with hearing loss Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 3A Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
Cadd
Uncertain
Dann
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
D;D;D
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
M;M;M
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
D;D;.
REVEL
Pathogenic
Sift
Benign
T;T;.
Sift4G
Benign
T;T;.
Polyphen
P;P;P
Vest4
MutPred
Gain of ubiquitination at K168 (P = 0.0851);Gain of ubiquitination at K168 (P = 0.0851);Gain of ubiquitination at K168 (P = 0.0851);
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at