Menu
GeneBe

rs376898963

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_004004.6(GJB2):c.493C>T(p.Arg165Trp) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000208 in 1,614,022 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00014 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00021 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

GJB2
NM_004004.6 missense

Scores

5
8
5

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.68
Variant links:
Genes affected
GJB2 (HGNC:4284): (gap junction protein beta 2) This gene encodes a member of the gap junction protein family. The gap junctions were first characterized by electron microscopy as regionally specialized structures on plasma membranes of contacting adherent cells. These structures were shown to consist of cell-to-cell channels that facilitate the transfer of ions and small molecules between cells. The gap junction proteins, also known as connexins, purified from fractions of enriched gap junctions from different tissues differ. According to sequence similarities at the nucleotide and amino acid levels, the gap junction proteins are divided into two categories, alpha and beta. Mutations in this gene are responsible for as much as 50% of pre-lingual, recessive deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 5 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 1 benign, 8 uncertain in NM_004004.6
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.019080848).
BP6
Variant 13-20189089-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-20189089-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 177736.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=3, Likely_benign=8, Benign=1}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
GJB2NM_004004.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.493C>T p.Arg165Trp missense_variant 2/2 ENST00000382848.5
GJB2XM_011535049.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.493C>T p.Arg165Trp missense_variant 2/2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
GJB2ENST00000382848.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.493C>T p.Arg165Trp missense_variant 2/21 NM_004004.6 P1
GJB2ENST00000382844.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.493C>T p.Arg165Trp missense_variant 1/1 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000158
AC:
24
AN:
152176
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00331
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000581
AC:
146
AN:
251098
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000648
AC XY:
88
AN XY:
135730
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000185
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00438
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000652
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000215
AC:
314
AN:
1461728
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000263
AC XY:
191
AN XY:
727158
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000597
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000894
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00326
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000450
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000364
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000144
AC:
22
AN:
152294
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000201
AC XY:
15
AN XY:
74466
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00290
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.0000416
ExAC
AF:
0.000659
AC:
80
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Nov 19, 2014- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsMay 17, 2019- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 05, 2021Observed as heterozygous variant without a second pathogenic variant in multiple individuals with hearing loss but also in unaffected relatives in published literature (Rickard et al., 2001; Putcha et al., 2007; Vanniya et al., 2017; Gurtler et al., 2008; Amritkumar et al., 2018); Located in the second extracellular domain of Cx26; In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports a deleterious effect; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 32425985, 31992338, 30245029, 20863150, 29542069, 29148562, 16950989, 12746422, 20234132, 17666888, 18607988, 20086306, 18941476, 29921236, 25388846, 11494963, 15617550) -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 29, 2024- -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 1A Uncertain:1Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPars Genome LabMay 18, 2021- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylJul 14, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMay 02, 2018Variant summary: GJB2 c.493C>T (p.Arg165Trp) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the cysteine-rich domain (IPR019570) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00066 in 121246 control chromosomes (ExAC), predominantly observed within the South Asian subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0046, including 2 homozygotes. This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in GJB2 causing Autosomal Recessive Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss (0.00066 vs 0.025), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. The variant, c.493C>T, has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss (NSHL) (Rickard 2001, Gurtler 2008, RamShankar 2003, Hamid 2009), however in none of these cases was a second allele identified. In addition, Santos_2005, reports two families in which affected individuals do not carry the variant of interest, showing lack of cosegregation. At least one publication reported experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function, demonstrating the constriction of the channel pore in an intercellular dye transfer experiment (Xiao 2011). This defect might prevent the transmission of biochemically active molecules between cells, however, its implication in the pathomechanism is currently not clarified, and therefore this result does not allow convincing conclusions about the variant effect. A ClinVar submission from a clinical diagnostic laboratory (evaluation after 2014) cites the variant as "likely benign." Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineDec 06, 2014p.Arg165Trp in exon 2 of GJB2: This variant has been identified in 7 individuals with hearing loss (Rickard 2001, Putcha 2007, Santos 2005); however several of these individuals did not carry a second GJB2 variant. This variant is not expec ted to have clinical significance because it is has been identified in 0.4% (77/ 16,586) of South Asian chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (http://e xac.broadinstitute.org/;dbSNP rs376898963). -
Ichthyosis, hystrix-like, with hearing loss Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 3A Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.30
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.16
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.46
Cadd
Uncertain
26
Dann
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
0.88
D;D;D
Eigen
Uncertain
0.56
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.61
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.97
D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.13
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.019
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.69
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
3.1
M;M;M
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.68
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-5.4
D;D;.
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.83
Sift
Benign
0.23
T;T;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.13
T;T;.
Polyphen
0.92
P;P;P
Vest4
0.92
MutPred
0.72
Gain of ubiquitination at K168 (P = 0.0851);Gain of ubiquitination at K168 (P = 0.0851);Gain of ubiquitination at K168 (P = 0.0851);
MVP
0.96
MPC
0.049
ClinPred
0.17
T
GERP RS
5.5
Varity_R
0.64
gMVP
0.90

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs376898963; hg19: chr13-20763228; API