rs377670533
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1
The NM_001379081.2(FREM1):c.2169+11A>C variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000373 in 1,543,684 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00049 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00036 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
FREM1
NM_001379081.2 intron
NM_001379081.2 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.0320
Genes affected
FREM1 (HGNC:23399): (FRAS1 related extracellular matrix 1) This gene encodes a basement membrane protein that may play a role in craniofacial and renal development. Mutations in this gene have been associated with bifid nose with or without anorectal and renal anomalies. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described. PubMed ID 19940113 describes one such variant that initiates transcription within a distinct, internal exon; the resulting shorter isoform (named Toll-like/interleukin-1 receptor regulator, TILRR) is suggested to be a co-receptor of the interleukin 1 receptor family and may regulate receptor function and Toll-like receptor/interleukin 1 receptor signal transduction, contributing to the control of inflammatory response activation. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2011]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.77).
BP6
Variant 9-14824014-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-14824014-T-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 366150.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000493 (75/152220) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00101 (69/68034). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000821. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 37 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FREM1 | NM_001379081.2 | c.2169+11A>C | intron_variant | ENST00000380880.4 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FREM1 | ENST00000380880.4 | c.2169+11A>C | intron_variant | 5 | NM_001379081.2 | P1 | |||
FREM1 | ENST00000380875.7 | c.2169+11A>C | intron_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000493 AC: 75AN: 152220Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
75
AN:
152220
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000453 AC: 92AN: 202982Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000479 AC XY: 52AN XY: 108502
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
92
AN:
202982
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
52
AN XY:
108502
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000360 AC: 501AN: 1391464Hom.: 1 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.000432 AC XY: 298AN XY: 689180
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
501
AN:
1391464
Hom.:
Cov.:
23
AF XY:
AC XY:
298
AN XY:
689180
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000493 AC: 75AN: 152220Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000498 AC XY: 37AN XY: 74364
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
75
AN:
152220
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
37
AN XY:
74364
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Apr 28, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 18, 2023 | - - |
Oculotrichoanal syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at