rs387907278
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 12 ACMG points: 12P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP3_StrongPP5_Moderate
The NM_003238.6(TGFB2):c.1013C>A(p.Pro338His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P338T) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003238.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGFB2 | NM_003238.6 | c.1013C>A | p.Pro338His | missense_variant | 6/7 | ENST00000366930.9 | |
TGFB2 | NM_001135599.4 | c.1097C>A | p.Pro366His | missense_variant | 7/8 | ||
TGFB2 | NR_138148.2 | n.2264C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 6/7 | |||
TGFB2 | NR_138149.2 | n.2348C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 7/8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGFB2 | ENST00000366930.9 | c.1013C>A | p.Pro338His | missense_variant | 6/7 | 1 | NM_003238.6 | P1 | |
TGFB2 | ENST00000366929.4 | c.1097C>A | p.Pro366His | missense_variant | 7/8 | 1 | |||
TGFB2 | ENST00000479322.1 | n.497C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 4/5 | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 34
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Loeys-Dietz syndrome 4 Pathogenic:2
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Jul 08, 2012 | - - |
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Baylor-Hopkins Center for Mendelian Genomics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at