Menu
GeneBe

rs397507233

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 2P and 3B. PM5BP4_ModerateBP6

The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.446A>C(p.Glu149Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000994 in 1,610,368 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E149K) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000033 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000075 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA1
NM_007294.4 missense

Scores

1
8
9

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.99
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.

PM5
Other missense variant is known to change same aminoacid residue: Variant chr17-43099876-TC-TTT is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.123622864).
BP6
Variant 17-43099876-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43099876-T-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 37594.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=4, Benign=1, Likely_benign=4}. Variant chr17-43099876-T-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA1NM_007294.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.446A>C p.Glu149Ala missense_variant 7/23 ENST00000357654.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA1ENST00000357654.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.446A>C p.Glu149Ala missense_variant 7/231 NM_007294.4 P4P38398-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000328
AC:
5
AN:
152252
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000960
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000517
AC:
13
AN:
251420
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000294
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
135878
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000598
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00000754
AC:
11
AN:
1458116
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00000138
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
725672
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000166
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000328
AC:
5
AN:
152252
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000672
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
74390
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000960
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000434
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000113
ExAC
AF:
0.0000576
AC:
7

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 03, 2022In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports a deleterious effect; Published functional study demonstrates no significant difference compared to wild type in a homologous directed repair assay (Lu 2015); Also known as 565A>C; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29805665, 27257965, 22116506, 20215511, 30702160, 31825140, 35116780, 32467295, 32548945, 26689913) -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoDec 26, 2020- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpSep 26, 2023Variant summary: BRCA1 c.446A>C (p.Glu149Ala) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 5.2e-05 in 251420 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0006 within the East Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. This frequency is not significantly higher than estimated for a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (5.2e-05 vs 0.001), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.446A>C has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with early-onset breast cancer, colorectal cancer with suspected Lynch syndrome, stomach adenocarcinoma, and thoracic cancer, all without evidence of causality and often reported as VUS or benign (e.g. Lu_2015, Xu_2020, Wei_2018, Shen_2019, Zhong_2016, Tsang_2023). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function (e.g. Lu_2015). These results showed no damaging effect of this variant in an HDR assay. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 26689913, 35116780, 36964191, 29805665, 32548945, 27257965). Eight submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014, classifying the variant as benign (n=1), likely benign (n=3), or uncertain significance (n=4). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)Sep 04, 2008- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of BolognaSep 01, 2023BS1(Strong)+BP1(Strong) according to ACMG/AMP classification guidelines specified for BRCA1 & BRCA2 (Classification Criteria V1.0.0 2023-09-08 - https://cspec.genome.network/cspec/ui/svi/affiliation/50087) (PMID: 38160042) -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 16, 2020This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthApr 19, 2016- -
Breast neoplasm Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterresearchLaboratory of Molecular Diagnosis of Cancer, West China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityNov 01, 2015- -
Familial cancer of breast;C2676676:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1;C3280442:Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 4;C4554406:Fanconi anemia, complementation group S Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsOct 31, 2018- -
Malignant tumor of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The BRCA1 p.Glu149Ala variant was identified in 2 of 1302 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.002) from Chinese individuals or families with sporadic breast cancer (Zhong_2016_27257965, Zhang_2012_ 22116506). A functional validation study of BRCA1 missense variants using a HDR assay in triplicate found the variant’s HDR ability was not impaired (not significant) (Lu_2015_26689913). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs397507233) “With Uncertain significance allele”, ClinVar (classified as uncertain significance by Laboratory for Molecular Diagnosis of Cancer (West China Hospital, Sichuan University), Ambry Genetics, Inivitae, GeneDx and SCRP), Clinvitae (5x), and UMD-LSDB (4x 3-UV), and was not identified in GeneInsight-COGR, Cosmic, MutDB, LOVD 3.0, BIC Database, ARUP Laboratories or Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database. The variant was identified in control databases in 14 of 277160 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00005 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017), observed in the following populations: Other in 1 of 6464 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Latino in 1 of 34418 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003) and East Asian in 12 of 18870 chromosomes (freq: 0.0006) while not observed in the African, European Non-Finnish, Ashkenazi Jewish, European Finnish, and South Asian populations. The p.Glu149 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact of Ala to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 1 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 05, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.16
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.011
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.11
Cadd
Benign
19
Dann
Uncertain
1.0
Eigen
Benign
0.095
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.10
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.75
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.94
D;D;D;D;D;D;T;T;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;T
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.41
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.12
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.74
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.4
M;M;M;M;.;M;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D;D;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.35
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.6
D;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;D;N;.;N;N;N;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.54
Sift
Uncertain
0.0080
D;D;D;T;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;.;D;D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.030
D;D;D;T;D;T;.;.;T;.;D;.;D;.;D;.
Polyphen
0.82, 0.99, 1.0, 0.96
.;P;.;.;.;D;.;D;.;.;P;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.43
MutPred
0.21
Loss of helix (P = 0.0558);Loss of helix (P = 0.0558);Loss of helix (P = 0.0558);Loss of helix (P = 0.0558);.;Loss of helix (P = 0.0558);.;.;.;.;Loss of helix (P = 0.0558);Loss of helix (P = 0.0558);Loss of helix (P = 0.0558);.;Loss of helix (P = 0.0558);.;
MVP
0.91
MPC
0.31
ClinPred
0.23
T
GERP RS
4.0
Varity_R
0.098
gMVP
0.48

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs397507233; hg19: chr17-41251893; API