rs56307213

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.79783G>C​(p.Asp26595His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0176 in 1,613,520 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 304 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. D26595D) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.014 ( 22 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.018 ( 282 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 missense

Scores

7
4
5

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:27

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.86

Publications

13 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.008546919).
BP6
Variant 2-178566349-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178566349-C-G is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 47380.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0144 (2195/152162) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.0213 (1449/67982). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0204. There are 22 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 1060 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 22 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkc.79783G>C p.Asp26595His missense_variant Exon 326 of 363 ENST00000589042.5 NP_001254479.2 A0A0A0MTS7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkc.79783G>C p.Asp26595His missense_variant Exon 326 of 363 5 NM_001267550.2 ENSP00000467141.1 A0A0A0MTS7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0144
AC:
2197
AN:
152044
Hom.:
22
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00418
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00329
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0146
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0104
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000387
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0112
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0216
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00949
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0213
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0120
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0146
AC:
3638
AN:
248720
AF XY:
0.0148
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00349
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0102
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00865
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000557
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0222
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0198
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0171
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0179
AC:
26133
AN:
1461358
Hom.:
282
Cov.:
38
AF XY:
0.0178
AC XY:
12933
AN XY:
726970
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00311
AC:
104
AN:
33460
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0110
AC:
492
AN:
44716
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00907
AC:
237
AN:
26124
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000504
AC:
2
AN:
39686
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0111
AC:
957
AN:
86254
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0240
AC:
1281
AN:
53310
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0118
AC:
68
AN:
5764
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0198
AC:
22014
AN:
1111688
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0162
AC:
978
AN:
60356
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.470
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1690
3380
5071
6761
8451
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
792
1584
2376
3168
3960
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0144
AC:
2195
AN:
152162
Hom.:
22
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0143
AC XY:
1060
AN XY:
74366
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00416
AC:
173
AN:
41552
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0146
AC:
222
AN:
15246
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0104
AC:
36
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000388
AC:
2
AN:
5152
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0112
AC:
54
AN:
4820
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0216
AC:
229
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00680
AC:
2
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0213
AC:
1449
AN:
67982
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0118
AC:
25
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
118
236
353
471
589
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
28
56
84
112
140
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0171
Hom.:
26
Bravo
AF:
0.0128
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0167
AC:
62
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0187
AC:
72
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00469
AC:
19
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0200
AC:
168
ExAC
AF:
0.0147
AC:
1784
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00549
AC:
19
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0205
EpiControl
AF:
0.0211

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:27
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:11
Jun 24, 2013
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

- -

Aug 15, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 11, 2024
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 26, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Asp24027His in exon 275 of TTN: This variant is classified as benign based on it s high frequency in the general population (dbSNP rs56307213; NHLBI Exome Sequen cing Project, http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS). -

Dec 08, 2023
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 30, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:4
-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 27, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

TTN-related disorder Benign:1
Apr 08, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Mar 27, 2013
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.78
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.23
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.090
CADD
Benign
22
DANN
Benign
0.87
Eigen
Pathogenic
1.0
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.97
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.96
D;D;D;.;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0085
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.12
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
3.9
.;.;.;H;.;.;H
PhyloP100
7.9
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.71
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-5.1
D;D;.;.;D;D;.
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.69
Sift
Uncertain
0.0070
D;D;.;.;D;D;.
Polyphen
1.0
.;.;.;D;.;.;D
Vest4
0.34
MPC
0.50
ClinPred
0.046
T
GERP RS
5.9
Mutation Taster
=95/5
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs56307213; hg19: chr2-179431076; API