rs56337919

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4BP6_Very_Strong

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):​c.3839A>T​(p.Asp1280Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000052 in 1,558,032 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D1280G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000059 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000051 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

2
2
12

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:1B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.245
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.28085154).
BP6
Variant 13-32338194-A-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32338194-A-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 51537.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32338194-A-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.3839A>T p.Asp1280Val missense_variant 11/27 ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.3839A>T p.Asp1280Val missense_variant 11/275 NM_000059.4 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000591
AC:
9
AN:
152238
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000132
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000283
AC:
6
AN:
212168
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000433
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
115602
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000609
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000403
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000198
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000512
AC:
72
AN:
1405794
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.0000517
AC XY:
36
AN XY:
696450
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000646
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000868
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000256
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000572
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000690
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000591
AC:
9
AN:
152238
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000134
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74382
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000132
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000291
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000982
ExAC
AF:
0.00000825
AC:
1

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:13
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)Oct 22, 2009- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)May 29, 2002- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylDec 01, 2015- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBRCAlab, Lund UniversityMar 02, 2020- -
Benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationEvidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)Aug 10, 2015IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.0000286 -
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoDec 17, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpAug 31, 2020Variant summary: BRCA2 c.3839A>T (p.Asp1280Val) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2.8e-05 in 212168 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. The variant, c.3839A>T has been reported in the literature in sequencing studies of individuals with high risk breast cancer as well as in an unaffected individual (Lu_2012, Carney_2010) in addition to sequencing studies of patients undergoing cancer screening for varied indications (example, Easton_2007, DeLeeneer_2008, Seymour_2008, Hartman_2001, Machackova_2019). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions regarding the association of this variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. At-least one co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant has been observed at our laboratory (BRCA1 c.66dupA, p.Glu23fsX18), providing additional supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Five clinical diagnostic laboratories and one expert panel (ENIGMA) have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All submitters classified the variant as benign (n=4)/likely benign(n=2). Some submitters cite overlapping evidence utilized in the context of this evaluation. We have not identified any evidence supporting an actionable outcome in over 5 years since its initial classification by our laboratory. Based on the evidence outlined above, and the predominant consensus in the field, the variant was classified as benign. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 19, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Dec 28, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMay 02, 2016- -
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 18, 2020In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports a deleterious effect; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24323938, 11698567, 17924331, 21990134) -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJun 15, 2017- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 30, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.11
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.14
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.26
CADD
Benign
10
DANN
Benign
0.92
Eigen
Benign
-0.37
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.48
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.027
N
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.33
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.28
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.90
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.30
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-5.6
D;D
REVEL
Benign
0.16
Sift
Uncertain
0.0010
D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.027
D;D
Vest4
0.42
MutPred
0.26
Gain of sheet (P = 0.0221);Gain of sheet (P = 0.0221);
MVP
0.62
MPC
0.069
ClinPred
0.12
T
GERP RS
3.1
gMVP
0.28

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs56337919; hg19: chr13-32912331; COSMIC: COSV99061635; COSMIC: COSV99061635; API