rs587778438
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 1P and 14B. PP2BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_005120.3(MED12):c.5593A>G(p.Met1865Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000397 in 1,209,899 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 18 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005120.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MED12 | NM_005120.3 | c.5593A>G | p.Met1865Val | missense_variant | 39/45 | ENST00000374080.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MED12 | ENST00000374080.8 | c.5593A>G | p.Met1865Val | missense_variant | 39/45 | 1 | NM_005120.3 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0000627 AC: 7AN: 111658Hom.: 0 Cov.: 22 AF XY: 0.0000886 AC XY: 3AN XY: 33842
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000553 AC: 1AN: 180763Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 67111
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000373 AC: 41AN: 1098241Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000413 AC XY: 15AN XY: 363597
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0000627 AC: 7AN: 111658Hom.: 0 Cov.: 22 AF XY: 0.0000886 AC XY: 3AN XY: 33842
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 02, 2021 | - - |
FG syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Oct 16, 2023 | - - |
not specified Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at