rs587781076

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_002474.3(MYH11):c.387A>G(p.Lys129Lys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00175 in 1,614,070 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 41 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0095 ( 25 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00093 ( 16 hom. )

Consequence

MYH11
NM_002474.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.500

Variant links:

Genes affected

MYH11 (HGNC:7569): (myosin heavy chain 11) The protein encoded by this gene is a smooth muscle myosin belonging to the myosin heavy chain family. The gene product is a subunit of a hexameric protein that consists of two heavy chain subunits and two pairs of non-identical light chain subunits. It functions as a major contractile protein, converting chemical energy into mechanical energy through the hydrolysis of ATP. A chromosomal rearrangement involving this gene is associated with acute myeloid leukemia of the M4Eo subtype. Mutations in this gene are associated with visceral myopathy, megacystis-microcolon-intestinal hypoperistalsis syndrome 2, and familial thoracic aortic aneurysm 4. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

MYH11 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.54).

BP6

Variant 16-15823370-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-15823370-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 138365.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr16-15823370-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00955 (1453/152180) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0327 (1358/41512). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0313. There are 25 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 713 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 25 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MYH11	NM_002474.3 link	c.387A>G	p.Lys129Lys	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 41	ENST00000300036.6	NP_002465.1	P35749-1A0A024QZJ4
MYH11	NM_001040113.2 link	c.387A>G	p.Lys129Lys	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 43	ENST00000452625.7	NP_001035202.1	P35749-3
MYH11	NM_001040114.2 link	c.387A>G	p.Lys129Lys	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 42		NP_001035203.1	P35749-2
MYH11	NM_022844.3 link	c.387A>G	p.Lys129Lys	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 42		NP_074035.1	P35749-4A0A024QZJ6

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
MYH11	ENST00000300036.6 link	c.387A>G	p.Lys129Lys	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 41	1	NM_002474.3	ENSP00000300036.5		P35749-1
MYH11	ENST00000452625.7 link	c.387A>G	p.Lys129Lys	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 43	1	NM_001040113.2	ENSP00000407821.2		P35749-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00944

AC:

1436

AN:

152062

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0324

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00400

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000208

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000265

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00669

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00247

AC:

621

AN:

251490

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00195

AC XY:

265

AN XY:

135920

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0328

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00188

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000105

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00147

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000934

AC:

1365

AN:

1461890

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000847

AC XY:

616

AN XY:

727246

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0308

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00179

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000383

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000696

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000791

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00257

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00955

AC:

1453

AN:

152180

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00958

AC XY:

713

AN XY:

74400

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0327

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00399

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000208

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000265

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00662

Alfa

AF:

0.00474

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0107

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00404

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000109

EpiControl

AF:

0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:13

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:4

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 15, 2014

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection

Benign:4

Jul 20, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Feb 05, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 04, 2016

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 16, 2018

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:3

Sep 06, 2016

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: The MYH11 c.387A>G (p.Lys129Lys) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. One in silico tool predicts a damaging outcome for this variant. 4/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. ESE finder predicts that this variant may affect ESE site of SRp40. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 363/121412 control chromosomes (4 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.0029898, which is approximately 2392 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic MYH11 variant (0.0000013), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories classified this variant as benign. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications and/or reputable databases/clinical diagnostic laboratories; nor evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. -

Jul 08, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Aortic aneurysm, familial thoracic 4

Benign:2

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Feb 01, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.54

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.65

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over