rs587781351
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM1BP4_ModerateBP6BS2_Supporting
The NM_004360.5(CDH1):c.2254G>A(p.Val752Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000124 in 1,614,126 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004360.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | NM_004360.5 | c.2254G>A | p.Val752Ile | missense_variant | 14/16 | ENST00000261769.10 | |
CDH1 | NM_001317184.2 | c.2071G>A | p.Val691Ile | missense_variant | 13/15 | ||
CDH1 | NM_001317185.2 | c.706G>A | p.Val236Ile | missense_variant | 14/16 | ||
CDH1 | NM_001317186.2 | c.289G>A | p.Val97Ile | missense_variant | 13/15 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | ENST00000261769.10 | c.2254G>A | p.Val752Ile | missense_variant | 14/16 | 1 | NM_004360.5 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152168Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251480Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 135916
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000103 AC: 15AN: 1461840Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000963 AC XY: 7AN XY: 727220
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0000328 AC: 5AN: 152286Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74452
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Apr 04, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 19, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Mar 06, 2023 | This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Apr 12, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 28, 2024 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | May 30, 2022 | Variant summary: CDH1 c.2254G>A (p.Val752Ile) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the Cadherin, cytoplasmic domain of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4e-06 in 251480 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.2254G>A has been reported in the literature in an individual affected with Breast Cancer (Adedokun_2020). This report does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Breast Cancer. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Five clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 27, 2017 | This variant is denoted CDH1 c.2254G>A at the cDNA level, p.Val752Ile (V752I) at the protein level, and results in the change of a Valine to an Isoleucine (GTT>ATT). This variant has not, to our knowledge, been published in the literature as pathogenic or benign. CDH1 Val752Ile was not observed at a significant allele frequency in large population cohorts (Lek 2016). Since Valine and Isoleucine share similar properties, this is considered a conservative amino acid substitution. CDH1 Val752Ile occurs at a position where amino acids with properties similar to Valine are tolerated across species and is located in the cytoplasmic domain (Brooks-Wilson 2004, Figueiredo 2013). In silico analyses are inconsistent regarding the effect this variant may have on protein structure and function. Based on currently available evidence, it is unclear whether CDH1 Val752Ile is a pathogenic or benign variant. We consider it to be a variant of uncertain significance. - |
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Feb 16, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at