rs587781629
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 14 ACMG points: 14P and 0B. PVS1_StrongPM2PP5_Very_Strong
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.1909+1G>A variant causes a splice donor change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000686 in 1,457,272 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predicting alterations to normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 6.9e-7 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
BRCA2
NM_000059.4 splice_donor
NM_000059.4 splice_donor
Scores
5
1
1
Splicing: ADA: 1.000
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 5.70
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 14 ACMG points.
PVS1
Splicing +-2 bp (donor or acceptor) variant, product NOT destroyed by NMD, known LOF gene, truncates exone, which is 0.10870625 fraction of the gene. No cryptic splice site detected. Exon removal is inframe change.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
PP5
Variant 13-32333388-G-A is Pathogenic according to our data. Variant chr13-32333388-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_pathogenic]. Clinvar id is 141283.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr13-32333388-G-A is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic]. Variant chr13-32333388-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_pathogenic].
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.1909+1G>A | splice_donor_variant | ENST00000380152.8 | NP_000050.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.1909+1G>A | splice_donor_variant | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.86e-7 AC: 1AN: 1457272Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 724414
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
1457272
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
724414
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Pathogenic/Likely pathogenic
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:16
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Pathogenic:3
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA), c/o University of Cambridge | Oct 02, 2015 | - - |
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BRCA2 c.1909+1G>A variant was not identified in the literature, but was identified in the UMD (2X as a causal variant). The c.1909+1G>A variant is predicted to cause abnormal splicing because the nucleotide substitution occurs in the invariant region of the splice consensus sequence. In addition, four in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a difference in splicing, with an abolishment of the 5' slice donor site in the mutated sequence. In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory’s criteria to be classified as pathogenic. - |
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Jun 23, 2017 | - - |
not provided Pathogenic:3
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jul 31, 2020 | This variant is located in a canonical splice-acceptor site and interferes with normal BRCA2 mRNA splicing. In the published literature, this variant has been reported in individuals affected with breast cancer and ovarian cancer (PMID: 30103829 (2018), 26845104 (2016), 26296696 (2015)). This variant has also been reported to have a deleterious effect on BRCA2 mRNA splicing (PMID: 31343793 (2019)). Based on the available information, this variant is classified as pathogenic. - |
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 12, 2019 | Not observed in large population cohorts (Lek 2016); Canonical splice site variant predicted to result in an in-frame deletion of exon 10; Observed in individuals with a personal and/or family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer (Chong 2014, Frey 2015, Minucci 2015, Shirts 2016, Frey 2017, Cardoso 2018, Marchetti 2018); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26296696, 26306726, 24830819, 26845104, 28495237, 30128899, 30103829, 29446198, 31343793) - |
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Mar 06, 2023 | The BRCA2 c.1909+1G>A variant (rs587781629) is reported in the literature in individuals with a personal and/or family history of breast or ovarian cancer (Frey 2015, Minucci 2015, Shirts 2016). This variant is absent from general population databases (Exome Variant Server, Genome Aggregation Database), indicating it is not a common polymorphism. This variant disrupts the canonical splice donor site of intron 10, which is likely to negatively impact gene function. Consistent with pedictions, functional studies suggest this variant causes skipping of exons 9 and 10, leading to a frameshift (Montalban 2019). Based on available information, this variant is considered to be pathogenic. References: Frey MK et al. Rescreening for genetic mutations using multi-gene panel testing in patients who previously underwent non-informative genetic screening. Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Nov;139(2):211-5. PMID: 26296696. Minucci A et al. Clinical impact on ovarian cancer patients of massive parallel sequencing for BRCA mutation detection: the experience at Gemelli hospital and a literature review. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2015;15(10):1383-403. PMID: 26306726. Montalban G et al. Incorporation of semi-quantitative analysis of splicing alterations for the clinical interpretation of variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Hum Mutat. 2019 Dec;40(12):2296-2317. PMID: 31343793. Shirts BH et al. Improving performance of multigene panels for genomic analysis of cancer predisposition. Genet Med. 2016 Oct;18(10):974-81. PMID: 26845104. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Pathogenic:3
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 19, 2023 | The c.1909+1G>A intronic variant results from a G to A substitution one nucleotide after coding exon 9 of the BRCA2 gene. This alteration has been reported in several individuals with a personal history of ovarian cancer (Chong HK et al. PLoS ONE. 2014 May;9:e97408; Minucci A et al. Expert Rev Mol Diagn, 2015 Aug;15:1383-403; Frey MK et al. Gynecol. Oncol. 2015 Nov;139:211-5) as well as in an individual with a history of breast cancer (Shirts BH et al. Genet Med, 2016 10;18:974-81). This alteration has also been reported in a patient with a history of breast and ovarian cancers who also carries the BRCA1 c.-19-?_80+?del alteration (Cardoso FC et al. Hum Genomics, 2018 08;12:39). Additionally, this alteration has been identified in a large, worldwide study of BRCA1/2 mutation positive families (Rebbeck TR et al. Hum. Mutat. 2018 05;39:593-620). RNA assays have shown this alteration to cause the skipping of coding exons 8 and 9 (total exons 9 and 10 in literature), which leads to a transcript that will undergo nonsense-mediated decay (Ambry internal data; Montalban G. et al J Med Genet 2019 02;56(2):63-74.) This nucleotide position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In silico splice site analysis predicts that this alteration will weaken the native splice donor site. This variant is considered to be rare based on population cohorts in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). Based on the majority of available evidence to date, this variant is likely to be pathogenic. - |
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Dec 29, 2023 | This variant causes a G to A nucleotide substitution at the +1 position of intron 10 of the BRCA2 gene. Splice site prediction tools predict that this variant may have a significant impact on RNA splicing. A functional study reports exon 9-10 skipping in 63.2% of transcripts resulting in a premature stop signal. This variant has been reported in individuals affected with breast or ovarian cancer, (PMID: 26296696, 26681678, 26845104, 28495237, 30103829, 30472649) an individual affected with pancreatic cancer (PMID: 32073954) and an unaffected individual (PMID: 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BRCA2_002958). This variant has not been identified in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). Loss of BRCA2 function is a known mechanism of disease (clinicalgenome.org). Based on the available evidence, this variant is classified as Pathogenic. - |
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jan 22, 2021 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Pathogenic:3
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 27, 2023 | This sequence change affects a donor splice site in intron 10 of the BRCA2 gene. RNA analysis indicates that disruption of this splice site induces altered splicing and may result in an absent or disrupted protein product. This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). Disruption of this splice site has been observed in individual(s) with clinical features of BRCA2-related conditions (PMID: 24830819, 26296696, 26845104, 29446198, 30103829, 31343793). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 141283). Studies have shown that disruption of this splice site results in skipping of exons 9-10 and introduces a premature termination codon (PMID: 31343793; Invitae). The resulting mRNA is expected to undergo nonsense-mediated decay. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. - |
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Oct 30, 2019 | Variant summary: BRCA2 c.1909+1G>A is located in a canonical splice-site and is predicted to affect mRNA splicing resulting in a significantly altered protein due to either exon skipping, shortening, or inclusion of intronic material. Several computational tools predict a significant impact on normal splicing: Four predict the variant abolishes a 5' splicing donor site. However, to our knowledge, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant was absent in 235928 control chromosomes. c.1909+1G>A has been reported in the literature in multiple individuals affected with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (example, Chong_2014 and Rebbeck_2018). These data indicate that the variant is likely to be associated with disease. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Nine clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as pathogenic (n=5)/likely pathogenic (n=4). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as pathogenic. - |
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | research | Hereditary Cancer Genetics group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology | Mar 01, 2019 | - - |
Medulloblastoma;C0346153:Familial cancer of breast;C0376358:Malignant tumor of prostate;C1838457:Fanconi anemia complementation group D1;C2675520:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2;C2751641:Glioma susceptibility 3;C3150546:Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1 Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Apr 04, 2022 | - - |
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington | Nov 20, 2015 | - - |
Gastric cancer Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | research | Laboratory for Genotyping Development, RIKEN | Jul 01, 2021 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Mar 05, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Uncertain
Eigen
Pathogenic
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Pathogenic
dbscSNV1_RF
Pathogenic
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_DL_spliceai
Position offset: -1
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at