Menu
GeneBe

rs587781813

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4BS2

The NM_002878.4(RAD51D):​c.796C>T​(p.Arg266Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000115 in 1,614,150 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R266H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000053 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00012 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

RAD51D
NM_002878.4 missense

Scores

3
5
5

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:3U:16B:3O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.32
Variant links:
Genes affected
RAD51D (HGNC:9823): (RAD51 paralog D) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the RAD51 protein family. RAD51 family members are highly similar to bacterial RecA and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51, which are known to be involved in the homologous recombination and repair of DNA. This protein forms a complex with several other members of the RAD51 family, including RAD51L1, RAD51L2, and XRCC2. The protein complex formed with this protein has been shown to catalyze homologous pairing between single- and double-stranded DNA, and is thought to play a role in the early stage of recombinational repair of DNA. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. Read-through transcription also exists between this gene and the downstream ring finger and FYVE-like domain containing 1 (RFFL) gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.3298671).
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 8 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
RAD51DNM_002878.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.796C>T p.Arg266Cys missense_variant 9/10 ENST00000345365.11
RAD51L3-RFFLNR_037714.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.548C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 5/7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
RAD51DENST00000345365.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.796C>T p.Arg266Cys missense_variant 9/101 NM_002878.4 P1O75771-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000526
AC:
8
AN:
152172
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000724
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000175
AC:
44
AN:
251416
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000169
AC XY:
23
AN XY:
135888
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000615
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000849
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000132
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000326
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000121
AC:
177
AN:
1461860
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000157
AC XY:
114
AN XY:
727232
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000101
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000846
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000791
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000182
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000525
AC:
8
AN:
152290
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000403
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
74462
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000722
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000818
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000491
ExAC
AF:
0.000198
AC:
24
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:3Uncertain:16Benign:3Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 4 Pathogenic:1Uncertain:6Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylSep 27, 2016- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical CenterJan 01, 2019- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetics and Molecular Pathology, SA PathologyOct 07, 2020- -
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMGZ Medical Genetics CenterAug 03, 2022- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNeuberg Centre For Genomic Medicine, NCGM-The missense c.796C>T p.Arg266Cys variant in the RAD51D gene has been reported has been reported in individuals affected with breast and ovarian cancer Hauke, Jan et al., 2018. This variant is reported with the allele frequency 0.01% in the gnomAD Exomes and novel in 1000 Genomes. It is submitted to ClinVar as Likely Pathogenic/ Likely Benign/ Uncertain Significance multiple submissions. The amino acid Arginine at position 266 is changed to a Cystine changing protein sequence and it might alter its composition and physico-chemical properties. The variant is predicted as damaging by SIFT. The amino acid change p.Arg266Cys in RAD51D is predicted as conserved by GERP++ and PhyloP across 100 vertebrates. Functional studies are required to prove the pathogenicity of the variant. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Apr 06, 2023This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
not provided Pathogenic:2Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoApr 04, 2023The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00085 (26/30616 chromosomes in South Asian subpopulation, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. In the published literature, the variant has been reported in individuals with breast and/or ovarian cancer in the published literature (PMID: 31159747 (2019), 30111881 (2018), 29522266 (2018), 29470806 (2018), 23372765 (2013)). Additionally, in a large-scale breast cancer association study, the variant was observed in individuals with breast cancer as well as in healthy controls (PMID: 33471991 (2021), see also LOVD (http://databases.lovd.nl/shared/genes/ RAD51D)). Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is damaging. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU DresdenNov 03, 2021- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJul 31, 2023In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Observed in individuals with breast and/or ovarian cancer, but also in unaffected controls (Thompson et al., 2013; Hauke et al., 2018; Konstanta et al., 2018; Singh et al., 2018; Krivokuca et al., 2019; Tsaousis et al., 2019; Dorling et al., 2021); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30651582, 23372765, 25775023, 29522266, 30111881, 31159747, 29470806, 19327148, 14704354, 21111057, 36690744, 33471991, 26689913, 34284872) -
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University Hospital TübingenOct 23, 2020- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:3Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthFeb 06, 2023This missense variant replaces arginine with cysteine at codon 266 of the RAD51D protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in individuals affected with breast and ovarian cancer (PMID: 23372765, 29470806, 29522266, 30111881, 30651582). In a large breast cancer case-control study, this variant was identified in 6/60466 cases and 2/53461 controls (OR=2.653, 95%CI 0.535 to 13.143; p-value=0.296; PMID: 33471991 - Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID RAD51D_000013). This variant has also been identified in 46/282806 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Sep 15, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 20, 2022This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneKor MSAAug 01, 2018- -
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalJul 31, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpApr 10, 2024Variant summary: RAD51D c.796C>T (p.Arg266Cys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the DNA recombination and repair protein RecA-like, ATP-binding domain of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00011 in 1614150 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00081 within the South Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within South Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 6.48 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in RAD51D causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome phenotype (0.00013), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of South Asian origin. The variant, c.796C>T, has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with breast and/or ovarian cancer (Thompson_2013, Lu_2015, Konstanta_2018, Krivokuca_2019). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 30111881, 30651582, 26689913, 23372765). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 141519). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioJun 01, 2023- -
RAD51D-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesFeb 11, 2024The RAD51D c.796C>T variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Arg266Cys. This variant has been reported in individuals with ovarian and/or breast cancer, but the clinical significance is unknown (Thompson et al. 2013. PubMed ID: 23372765; Konstanta et al. 2018. PubMed ID: 30111881; Supplementary Table S5 in Tsaousis et al. 2019. PubMed ID: 31159747). This variant is reported in 0.085% of alleles in individuals of South Asian descent in gnomAD and is interpreted as uncertain significance by the vast majority of clinical laboratories in ClinVar (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/141519/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
Malignant tumor of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-RAD51D, EXON9, c.796C>T, p.Arg266Cys, Heterozygous, Uncertain Significance The RAD51D p.Arg266Cys variant was identified in 3 of 16,144 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.0002) from individuals with breast or ovarian cancer and was not identified in 5310 control chromosomes from healthy individuals (Thompson 2013, Konstanta 2018, Hauke 2018). The variant was identified in dbSNP (rs587781813) as “with uncertain significance allele” and ClinVar (classified as uncertain significance by Invitae, Ambry Genetics and 6 other submitters). The variant was identified in control databases in 42 of 277,160 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0002 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 2 of 24,030 chromosomes (freq: 0.00008), Other in 2 of 6466 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003), European in 14 of 126,688 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), and South Asian in 24 of 30,782 chromosomes (freq: 0.0008); it was not observed in the Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian or Finnish populations. The p.Arg266 residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationGerman Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital CologneOct 11, 2023Contradictory data: In GC-HBOC centers also frequently found in non HBOC cases. In Cologne found 16X in 27.000 HBOC cases. In gnomAD found 16X in 75.000 NFEs and 26X in 15.000 SAS. Own functional analysis (unpublished) revealed damaging effect and LOH and Segregation in a family In Dorling et al. found 6X in 60466 BC cases and 2X in 53461 nonBC controls. According to the ACMG standard criteria we chose these criteria: PS3 (supporting pathogenic): Own functional analysis (unpublished) revealed damaging effect and LOH and Segregation in a family, BS1 (supporting benign): contradictory data: In GC-HBOC centers also frequently found in non HBOC cases. In Cologne found 16X in 27.000 HBOC cases. In gnomAD found 16X in 75.000 NFEs and 26X in 15.000 SAS. In Dorling et al. found 6X in 60466 BC cases and 2X in 53461 nonBC controls. -
Hereditary site-specific ovarian cancer syndrome Other:1
not provided, no classification providedphenotyping onlyGenomeConnect, ClinGen-Variant identified in multiple GenomeConnect participants. Variant classified as Uncertain significance and reported, most recently, on 11-27-2021 by Lab or GTR ID 506138. GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.22
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.089
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.010
CADD
Pathogenic
32
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.77
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.69
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.88
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.91
D;D;D;.;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.034
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.33
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.29
D
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D;D;D;D
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0010
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
Polyphen
0.99, 1.0
.;.;.;D;D;D;.;.
Vest4
0.72
MutPred
0.62
.;.;.;Loss of MoRF binding (P = 6e-04);Loss of MoRF binding (P = 6e-04);.;.;.;
MVP
0.87
MPC
0.49
ClinPred
0.41
T
GERP RS
4.9
Varity_R
0.49
gMVP
0.59

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs587781813; hg19: chr17-33428327; COSMIC: COSV60005260; COSMIC: COSV60005260; API